On 07/11/10 16:40, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 07/11/10 12:09, Cristian Morales Vega escribió:
That "libjpeg62 obsoletes and provides libjpeg8" is probably wrong? Shouldn't it obsolete/provide libjpeg6?
libjpeg-turbo has a different SONAME, so it SHOULD NOT not conflict, nor obsolete libjpeg8 in anyway.
jpeg8 must remain installed on the user system on upgrade in case it is needed by other packages.
Ah, I get it now. Fixed Obsoletes/Provides in my repo, please check if it's OK :-)