On 12/02/2013 09:15 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 02.12.2013 15:08, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a.
Valid definition... and something that can be agreed.
But it will still mean, I will not submit GNOME 3.11.2 to Factory; there
are surely bugs (that's why upstream does not release it stable branch)
and I don't know how fast any of the given bugs can be fixed... and I'm
not willing to chase down 250 git commits until the next snapshot
release comes (probably in 4 - 6 weeks).
So, as it stands, I will keep on waiting for 3.12.0 to become available,
at which point I probably can't submit it due to none of the integration
work being done / prepared (the upgrade will be too large for all other
packages to absorb it... and the GNOME Team will not have time to run
after everything, as we'd want 3.12.1 in there soon too).
so far, Factory was a 'integration' project, with the aim to be usable..
new it shall be a usable project, with the aim to integrate new stuff. A
small, but subtle difference. And the ultimate target to have it
stabilized was the release.
Yeah, there are several ideas floating around to get you back that
I don't think people are looking for "always broken", but more for
"mostly functioning a good chunk of the time".
The problem will be, if we have such a project we will need to find (a)
new shepherd(s) for that project. Now every one depends mostly on coolo
and that and will no longer be able to do in the future.
Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX
Public Cloud Architect
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org