From nevion@gmail.com Thu Jun 30 03:58:12 2016 From: Jason Newton To: factory@lists.opensuse.org Subject: Re: [opensuse-factory] making a cohesive python LATEST available Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 23:58:08 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0184228252725579507==" --===============0184228252725579507== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FYI I experimented with a python:stable in my home project (home:jenewton:python:stable). I get a build error on libatlas3 coming from devel:languages:python3, which I've linked the project to, along with devel:languages:python:Factory. libatlas3 is linked to from the Factory project, but that package isn't there anymore. I have many inherited packages but it seems like there's no packages available this experimental python:stable repository - is this normal when using linked projects? Here's the meta conf: Python Stable Latest Python stable packages x86_64 TLDR: Is Factory libatlas3 is broken? -Jason On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Jason Newton wrote: > adding some explicit maintainers to those projects (pulled from OBS > > pages). Sorry for the repost - toggled off plain text. > > > I noticed devel:languages:python3 and it seems to depend on > > devel:languages:python:Factory which I guess in theory provides the > > mentioned functionality but I don't think this is clean enough. In > > particular I don't have expectation Factory repositories of any sort > > as a stable branch. > > > So - can the maintainers of these projects create a stable cohesive > > variety? If you want to internally link the python package from > > Factory, be my guest - but the expectation is something like latest > > for the kernel or Qt (due to all the dependency packages). Offering > > the latest stable build of python with all related (and c-based) > > packages is important to any distribution/windows IMHO. > > > If I've missed something here, please let me know - I only stumbled > > onto the python3 side project by accident - I didn't see it written > > anywhere. > > > -Jason > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:41 AM, Dave Plater wro= te: > > > > > > > > > > On 24/06/2016 02:58, Jason Newton wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> > > >> I noticed a great reason to use python 3.5 today - PEP 465 - A > > >> > > >> dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication. This takes a > > >> > > >> great deal of pain out of numeric programming with python and this is > > >> > > >> the first series having it. > > >> > > >> > > >> But I was surprised to see there seems no way short of tumbleweed / > > >> > > >> devel:languages:python:Factory to use it. Is it such a beast to allow > > >> > > >> devel:languages:python to support it? Like with KDE, can we have a > > >> > > >> devel:languages:python:latest fork that rebuilds all things for 3.5? > > >> > > >> Keep in mind 3.5 series has been available since last September with > > >> > > >> the last release in start of December! > > >> > > >> > > >> -Jason > > > > > > +1 I need python 3.5 in Leap:42.2 for a blender update, blender since 2.7= 7 no longer builds against python 3.4 > > > > > > > > > Dave P > > > > > > -- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org > > > > > > To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org > > --=20 To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org --===============0184228252725579507==-- From sleep_walker@opensuse.org Thu Jun 30 08:26:08 2016 From: =?utf-8?b?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= To: factory@lists.opensuse.org Subject: Re: [opensuse-factory] making a cohesive python LATEST available Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:25:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20160630082541.p4bqoxgqstkzxjy4@venom> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5621677263727093764==" --===============5621677263727093764== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jason, sorry it took me so long to response. I'm deep in Hackweek not following outside world much. I found confusing that you miss python 3.5 in Tumbleweed. I'm running Tumbleweed and yet: $ python3 -V Python 3.5.1 # LANG=3DC zypper se -s --match-exact python3 Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository --+---------+---------+-----------+--------+----------- i | python3 | package | 3.5.1-3.4 | x86_64 | repo-oss v | python3 | package | 3.5.1-3.4 | i586 | repo-oss Regarding the d:l:python3:latest, if you're concerned about the python version used, we already use the highest version in distribution, if you are concerned that the set of packages is smaller in d:l:p3 than in d:l:p, there is unfortunate current state and Jan Matejek is working on build changes so in future there should be both Python 2.* and Python 3.* modules be built from the same source package within the same project (at least that is how I understand the plan). In the meantime you can submit the packages you miss and do the changes manually. I can't say much about cohesivness of the build but I guess it should be fine and I'd focus on problems if you meet one. The best solution is as always put everything into openSUSE:Factory and build it together. Regarding your libatlas3 problem: * package has disabled build in science * is failing in Education * is missing in openSUSE:Factory so, to fix it you need to fix in Education or science and submit it to openSUSE:Factory to solve your problem. I hope I covered all those topics and it helps you a bit. Best regards, S_W On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:58:08PM -0400, Jason Newton wrote: >FYI I experimented with a python:stable in my home project >(home:jenewton:python:stable). I get a build error on libatlas3 >coming from devel:languages:python3, which I've linked the project to, >along with devel:languages:python:Factory. libatlas3 is linked to >from the Factory project, but that package isn't there anymore. I >have many inherited packages but it seems like there's no packages >available this experimental python:stable repository - is this normal >when using linked projects? Here's the meta conf: > > > Python Stable > Latest Python stable packages > > > > > > x86_64 > > > >TLDR: Is Factory libatlas3 is broken? > >-Jason > >On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Jason Newton wrote: > >> adding some explicit maintainers to those projects (pulled from OBS >> >> pages). Sorry for the repost - toggled off plain text. >> >> >> I noticed devel:languages:python3 and it seems to depend on >> >> devel:languages:python:Factory which I guess in theory provides the >> >> mentioned functionality but I don't think this is clean enough. In >> >> particular I don't have expectation Factory repositories of any sort >> >> as a stable branch. >> >> >> So - can the maintainers of these projects create a stable cohesive >> >> variety? If you want to internally link the python package from >> >> Factory, be my guest - but the expectation is something like latest >> >> for the kernel or Qt (due to all the dependency packages). Offering >> >> the latest stable build of python with all related (and c-based) >> >> packages is important to any distribution/windows IMHO. >> >> >> If I've missed something here, please let me know - I only stumbled >> >> onto the python3 side project by accident - I didn't see it written >> >> anywhere. >> >> >> -Jason >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:41 AM, Dave Plater wr= ote: >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On 24/06/2016 02:58, Jason Newton wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I noticed a great reason to use python 3.5 today - PEP 465 - A >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication. This takes a >> >> >> >> >> >> great deal of pain out of numeric programming with python and this is >> >> >> >> >> >> the first series having it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> But I was surprised to see there seems no way short of tumbleweed / >> >> >> >> >> >> devel:languages:python:Factory to use it. Is it such a beast to allow >> >> >> >> >> >> devel:languages:python to support it? Like with KDE, can we have a >> >> >> >> >> >> devel:languages:python:latest fork that rebuilds all things for 3.5? >> >> >> >> >> >> Keep in mind 3.5 series has been available since last September with >> >> >> >> >> >> the last release in start of December! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Jason >> >> > >> >> > +1 I need python 3.5 in Leap:42.2 for a blender update, blender since 2.= 77 no longer builds against python 3.4 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Dave P >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org >> >> > >> >> > To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org >> > >--=20 >To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org >To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org > > --===============5621677263727093764== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" MIME-Version: 1.0 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcgdjIKCmlRSWNCQUVC Q0FBR0JRSlhkTmQ4QUFvSkVFb2o0MCtnTTBOdFE4c1AvQXRsQ2UyTy9tNWNiVU1NR0I4cmxpVysK WE1YSmMvaDluQ2Z6OTVxOVhrUm9QR3dGd1N3aE5lOXpRWE5FeVIrWmc1WFZ6c3UyQmZjZmJhNDNZ Z1dXdG1ObApGUDh4UGVNbmRQYU9MMjJMRW1HMUh0cEdPMzQyZTdVMEhVR25UV2RGUGVqL0NWMmJX UTBaOWh6SEpHOWJHSzA2CnpKbW1EbS9tWDJGeXlXRWxGUktOQWN2NVgrS3hOQTdEbXJKVHpLNjIy aXJ4MVBKNEQ5eUk2OGR6MTFXUWJ6V04Kb3NTak15aXlhV0FlcGVTRC83NFQyR1BIRStMUWhmbG5H YnR1aUFQSzhIb2ptVEQrNnNVZStKVDZDRjBCWllSYgpuaDRZVnVHa1dzR0Z5SDNyWUdIKy9aaUcy eGlWaUZFcHB0R2M3bUdKN2pKd3RkbFc3Y1JZZHlyS0ZXS3dWelR6ClZDOThKK25IR2YyMUhOd016 OEdZTm45eUNjcUFJRG1RODIxZThSMFBsL2dON1NmeHh6elE0YW81YmROQnZEZUMKNFV1M1U0K0Y2 L0ljU1VxNU5RNDFOem5zZDdxR3pCOFRBa0tibDVvRjZialRUdGEwNUNWZFBjUzhYeE5pTDNRegpr aWhnUDBrazJlOG42MGoyUVEzSnV1V2pGclhZYm83MUZ2bXRTbCtDMnJ3ejNtK1o1clVKenpqVS95 RmpiYnZoCjhtb1NsZVpKNU1MaERWajJ2dWJkbHg2T1JrU0tQNjR0QVdoKzhPcGpTZzdCaFlXUGd6 MkNmU2JmRkhMbkhaMnMKNkNUekdPT0hvQ0RsamJxYlhFYUFMNUcwMmQ3dTJUekhVMmpnVEZrL0xu bDBaYkx2S3BXWG9WUVg5UHNNbmV3dgppUGh5WmtpUDNleVF4VkJJUi9IbQo9UmtWYwotLS0tLUVO RCBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0K --===============5621677263727093764==-- From tcech@suse.com Thu Jun 30 09:33:57 2016 From: =?utf-8?b?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= To: factory@lists.opensuse.org Subject: Re: [opensuse-factory] making a cohesive python LATEST available Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:05:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20160630080504.tow4fwnk6onu76ue@venom> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8008944780872667686==" --===============8008944780872667686== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jason, sorry it took me so long to response. I'm deep in Hackweek not following outside world much. I found confusing that you miss python 3.5 in Tumbleweed. I'm running Tumbleweed and yet: $ python3 -V Python 3.5.1 # LANG=3DC zypper se -s --match-exact python3 Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository --+---------+---------+-----------+--------+----------- i | python3 | package | 3.5.1-3.4 | x86_64 | repo-oss v | python3 | package | 3.5.1-3.4 | i586 | repo-oss Regarding the d:l:python3:latest, if you're concerned about the python version used, we already use the highest version in distribution, if you are concerned that the set of packages is smaller in d:l:p3 than in d:l:p, there is unfortunate current state and Jan Matejek is working on build changes so in future there should be both Python 2.* and Python 3.* modules be built from the same source package within the same project (at least that is how I understand the plan). In the meantime you can submit the packages you miss and do the changes manually. I can't say much about cohesivness of the build but I guess it should be fine and I'd focus on problems if you meet one. The best solution is as always put everything into openSUSE:Factory and build it together. Regarding your libatlas3 problem: * package has disabled build in science * is failing in Education * is missing in openSUSE:Factory so, to fix it you need to fix in Education or science and submit it to openSUSE:Factory to solve your problem. I hope I covered all those topics and it helps you a bit. Best regards, S_W On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:58:08PM -0400, Jason Newton wrote: >FYI I experimented with a python:stable in my home project >(home:jenewton:python:stable). I get a build error on libatlas3 >coming from devel:languages:python3, which I've linked the project to, >along with devel:languages:python:Factory. libatlas3 is linked to >from the Factory project, but that package isn't there anymore. I >have many inherited packages but it seems like there's no packages >available this experimental python:stable repository - is this normal >when using linked projects? Here's the meta conf: > > > Python Stable > Latest Python stable packages > > > > > > x86_64 > > > >TLDR: Is Factory libatlas3 is broken? > >-Jason > >On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Jason Newton wrote: > >> adding some explicit maintainers to those projects (pulled from OBS >> >> pages). Sorry for the repost - toggled off plain text. >> >> >> I noticed devel:languages:python3 and it seems to depend on >> >> devel:languages:python:Factory which I guess in theory provides the >> >> mentioned functionality but I don't think this is clean enough. In >> >> particular I don't have expectation Factory repositories of any sort >> >> as a stable branch. >> >> >> So - can the maintainers of these projects create a stable cohesive >> >> variety? If you want to internally link the python package from >> >> Factory, be my guest - but the expectation is something like latest >> >> for the kernel or Qt (due to all the dependency packages). Offering >> >> the latest stable build of python with all related (and c-based) >> >> packages is important to any distribution/windows IMHO. >> >> >> If I've missed something here, please let me know - I only stumbled >> >> onto the python3 side project by accident - I didn't see it written >> >> anywhere. >> >> >> -Jason >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:41 AM, Dave Plater wr= ote: >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On 24/06/2016 02:58, Jason Newton wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I noticed a great reason to use python 3.5 today - PEP 465 - A >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication. This takes a >> >> >> >> >> >> great deal of pain out of numeric programming with python and this is >> >> >> >> >> >> the first series having it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> But I was surprised to see there seems no way short of tumbleweed / >> >> >> >> >> >> devel:languages:python:Factory to use it. Is it such a beast to allow >> >> >> >> >> >> devel:languages:python to support it? Like with KDE, can we have a >> >> >> >> >> >> devel:languages:python:latest fork that rebuilds all things for 3.5? >> >> >> >> >> >> Keep in mind 3.5 series has been available since last September with >> >> >> >> >> >> the last release in start of December! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Jason >> >> > >> >> > +1 I need python 3.5 in Leap:42.2 for a blender update, blender since 2.= 77 no longer builds against python 3.4 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Dave P >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org >> >> > >> >> > To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org >> > >--=20 >To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org >To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org > > --===============8008944780872667686== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" MIME-Version: 1.0 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcgdjIKCmlRSWNCQUVC Q0FBR0JRSlhkTktvQUFvSkVFb2o0MCtnTTBOdHBmWVAvUi80SXRUWGhTNUgxcDlKVVR1UFZyc2kK RUc2ejVGOTVST0R5UGgxRWtONTVvTVFCalJXZ0IzbHU0VFRVd3NLR3VvQmpVS3Z4NjI1dnFISmdQ bUZoSEZVYQp3N3RlQ2Y2cmRGMG5mQnJ1NFNRYkw0SXc3UUJaZ0F4ZzB2VGxzblhMNkt5Y1AwWVly SGt1ZGJQSEhjaDlFdDFZCmFUekFIZDlTRi9hcGd6QlM4VXBMUWdXZURzSWVCY1V6WFZpZGtTSjd6 L2txZ1B1NlRzaHhGd1FzNHYzdGVjTngKYm1yRmEwZEtaT2pWcnd1cUJwSlcranB3Zmc0Si9yZGli eWJjM0VFVGZQTFM5VGRMTEFQVzNDcUM2WkJvS0FXOApyNjhGdzFXOUUzbVdhZlJEaFhZbkx6S3k4 NGc4WCtZOTc3dk5qRWhibE14NytTdEhxUEZCZTJhREVNQTdhOVZaClk0eHV0dU5tNUI2SnR2bHFP cDNpUTdEYmtBTFFQYU9hTUFjS3hnWnJLUEFMMW5RQVY1SmRkVzVRQ1JTREl2MHkKNkFJV2JkWlVv c3NGM1BZMTVuRUdTZEhDR2V4UDBVMnR3STVlcE82UVlHYkFoZEpyckJlbEZkUVJrV1ZNVjdOdwph Mzdub3YwZXRDcnRVRVdJNWV6cUc2MzVkVktSd0tLV2k0VDRiSTNoc3Z6NWtWVmZwZGZaa1Uxa0tJ WkRma2NLCkVQTk1Va2RFcUNJb21mZDBmVjhaU1cwTXczTndrbHJHN0RrZXZEcy9DSXk4UGJYRjVm bE8rTUtWNmN2OGdXR0QKbTlmQS9lVTh1UlRHNmZ5TmJ1M0VyNTVWdnR3QWRzN0Q2bTRBc3pPc0ht N2RFajJwZFNqeXlFemVnVStBbnBCeApGYkNoT3V3dGtPY1JoRGxSQkd5TAo9bDE5MwotLS0tLUVO RCBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0K --===============8008944780872667686==-- From nevion@gmail.com Thu Jun 30 17:29:20 2016 From: Jason Newton To: factory@lists.opensuse.org Subject: Re: [opensuse-factory] making a cohesive python LATEST available Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:29:17 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160630082541.p4bqoxgqstkzxjy4@venom> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0881170272805944991==" --===============0881170272805944991== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1, I just wanted to quickly mention that I don't want tumbleweed for this purpose - I would like it to be available for the non rolling-release distribution. -Jason On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech wrote: > Hi Jason, > > sorry it took me so long to response. I'm deep in Hackweek not > following outside world much. > > I found confusing that you miss python 3.5 in Tumbleweed. I'm running > Tumbleweed and yet: > > $ python3 -V > Python 3.5.1 > > # LANG=3DC zypper se -s --match-exact python3 > Loading repository data... > Reading installed packages... > > S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository > --+---------+---------+-----------+--------+----------- > i | python3 | package | 3.5.1-3.4 | x86_64 | repo-oss > v | python3 | package | 3.5.1-3.4 | i586 | repo-oss > > > Regarding the d:l:python3:latest, if you're concerned about the python > version used, we already use the highest version in distribution, if > you are concerned that the set of packages is smaller in d:l:p3 than > in d:l:p, there is unfortunate current state and Jan Matejek is > working on build changes so in future there should be both Python 2.* > and Python 3.* modules be built from the same source package within > the same project (at least that is how I understand the plan). In the > meantime you can submit the packages you miss and do the changes > manually. > > I can't say much about cohesivness of the build but I guess it should > be fine and I'd focus on problems if you meet one. The best solution > is as always put everything into openSUSE:Factory and build it > together. > > Regarding your libatlas3 problem: > > * package has disabled build in science > * is failing in Education > * is missing in openSUSE:Factory > > so, to fix it you need to fix in Education or science and submit it to > openSUSE:Factory to solve your problem. > > I hope I covered all those topics and it helps you a bit. > > Best regards, > > S_W > > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:58:08PM -0400, Jason Newton wrote: >> >> FYI I experimented with a python:stable in my home project >> (home:jenewton:python:stable). I get a build error on libatlas3 >> coming from devel:languages:python3, which I've linked the project to, >> along with devel:languages:python:Factory. libatlas3 is linked to >> from the Factory project, but that package isn't there anymore. I >> have many inherited packages but it seems like there's no packages >> available this experimental python:stable repository - is this normal >> when using linked projects? Here's the meta conf: >> >> >> Python Stable >> Latest Python stable packages >> >> >> >> >> >> x86_64 >> >> >> >> TLDR: Is Factory libatlas3 is broken? >> >> -Jason >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Jason Newton wrote: >> >>> adding some explicit maintainers to those projects (pulled from OBS >>> >>> pages). Sorry for the repost - toggled off plain text. >>> >>> >>> I noticed devel:languages:python3 and it seems to depend on >>> >>> devel:languages:python:Factory which I guess in theory provides the >>> >>> mentioned functionality but I don't think this is clean enough. In >>> >>> particular I don't have expectation Factory repositories of any sort >>> >>> as a stable branch. >>> >>> >>> So - can the maintainers of these projects create a stable cohesive >>> >>> variety? If you want to internally link the python package from >>> >>> Factory, be my guest - but the expectation is something like latest >>> >>> for the kernel or Qt (due to all the dependency packages). Offering >>> >>> the latest stable build of python with all related (and c-based) >>> >>> packages is important to any distribution/windows IMHO. >>> >>> >>> If I've missed something here, please let me know - I only stumbled >>> >>> onto the python3 side project by accident - I didn't see it written >>> >>> anywhere. >>> >>> >>> -Jason >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:41 AM, Dave Plater >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On 24/06/2016 02:58, Jason Newton wrote: >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Hi, >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I noticed a great reason to use python 3.5 today - PEP 465 - A >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication. This takes a >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> great deal of pain out of numeric programming with python and this is >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> the first series having it. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> But I was surprised to see there seems no way short of tumbleweed / >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> devel:languages:python:Factory to use it. Is it such a beast to allow >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> devel:languages:python to support it? Like with KDE, can we have a >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> devel:languages:python:latest fork that rebuilds all things for 3.5? >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Keep in mind 3.5 series has been available since last September with >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> the last release in start of December! >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -Jason >>> >>> > >>> >>> > +1 I need python 3.5 in Leap:42.2 for a blender update, blender since >>> > 2.77 no longer builds against python 3.4 >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Dave P >>> >>> > >>> >>> > -- >>> >>> > >>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org >>> >>> > >>> >>> > To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org >>> > >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org >> To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org >> >> > --=20 To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org --===============0881170272805944991==--