openSUSE Factory October 2013

factory@lists.opensuse.org

132 participants
144 discussions

by Jos Poortvliet

Hi all, The release team made openSUSE 13.1 RC2 available - help us test it, as we're close to release! See https://news.opensuse.org/?p=16786 for some idea of what's new and what needs extra attention: the live images, secure boot and of course btrfs. It's all over our mirrors, see software.opensuse.org/developer and get it. /J

8 years, 8 months

[opensuse-factory] Interesting developments on the H.264 codec

by C

In case anyone is interested: http://xiphmont.livejournal.com/61927.html The short of it is, Cisco is making H.264 available at no cost to anyone who wants to use it. It is a legal way (a hack, but legal) to include/distribute H.264. Mozilla is including it in Firefox. Quoting: These modules will be usable by downstream distributions of Firefox, as well as by any other project." (source: https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2013/10/30/video-interoperability-on-the-web-… ) How does that affect openSUSE? Does this mean a possible change to openSUSE's use/inclusion/availability of H.264 (currently H.264 is included in the Fluendo package)? C. -- openSUSE 12.3 x86_64, KDE 4.11 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 8 months

[opensuse-factory] RC2 for low bandwidth users?

by Greg Freemyer

All, Do we have any idea how big the "zypper up" will be from 13.1 RC2 to 13.1 general release? == why I ask == I have a friend that wants to try out Linux for the first time. I don't want to wait for 13.1 Gold (which is a couple weeks away). I'm thinking of loading 13.1 RC2 on his system. I can download the DVD and burn it easily enough. Trouble is he has a low bandwidth connection so if there is going to be a GB or more of upgrades from RC2 to Gold, I need to figure out a different solution. Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 8 months

[opensuse-factory] gcc-4.8 serious bug? gcc regression

by Linda Walsh

Just tried to build (using configure) a package that failed in the gcc test. Seems like the graphite loop optimizer is missing. The manpage infers that the wrong build options were used.(?) (was present in earlier versions). The error was: conftest.c:1:0: sorry, unimplemented: Graphite loop optimizations cannot be used (-fgraphite, -fgraphite-identity, -floop-block, -floop-interchange, -floop-strip-mine, -floop-parallelize-all, and -ftree-loop-linear) /* confdefs.h */ The manpage says this about the loop optimizer: To use this code transformation, GCC has to be configured with --with-ppl and --with-cloog to enable the Graphite loop transformation infrastructure. gcc-4.8-1.3.x86_64.rpm dated Aug 5 rpm -V gcc verifies it as integrous. (yeah, it's a valid word) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 8 months

[opensuse-factory] BlueZ 5

by Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger

Hi all, I've just ran across an issue with Bluetooth in openSUSE 13.1; mainly, the GNOME Stack does not work with BlueZ 4.x anymore. There are several components that have been ported to Bluez 5 already; and, as most of the stuff is not relying on the library (as this has been marked obsolete by upstream anyway), not much was seen prior to actually finding a BT device to pair it. The D-Bus APi changed and, as a result, stuff relying on it simply has a 50% chance to work or not work. To make matters worse, we can't even just 'parallel install' bluez and bluez5, as the DBus services clash (same name space). So, we have the hard bullet to bite: either we update (Fedora decided to do so, see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-August/187738.html for reference) or we accept to have a non-working BT stack in GNOME. Updating it would likely still leave a few breakages here and there; but KDE's BlueDevil for example does have support in git. The 2nd alternative would be to 'try to undo' the Bluez 5 porting in the GNOME Stack; No idea if and how well this will work; we would be the only distro with GNOME 3.10 running on Bluez 4. Any opinions around here? -- Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 8 months

[opensuse-factory] deleterequest for pdksh

by Guido Berhoerster

Hi, can one of the factory maintainers please approve deleterequest 203778 for pdksh? It's been sitting there for 11 days and I have some followup changes. Thanks. -- Guido Berhoerster -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 8 months

[opensuse-factory] btrfs still fails writing more than 15-TB

by Lew Wolfgang

(its finished now) Hi Folks, I finally have a chance to work on my previously reported issue with btrfs where I can't write more than about 15-TB to a single partition. Here's the machine: Supermicro X9DRH mobo 2-ea Xeon E5-2643 64-GB RAM 1-ea LSI MegaRAID SAS 2208 RAID controller 2-ea SSD 120-GB drives configured as RAID-1 mirror 24-ea 2-TB SATA drives configured as two 11-disk RAID-6 arrays with 2-hotswaps So I loaded 13.1 beta1 and pulled a "zipper dup". Here are my initial observations. 1. No more reiserfs! 2. The installer complains about using XFS on the boot partition 3. The installer complains if the boot partition is less than 12-MB (good!) But the installer won't let the install proceed past the final summary screen if I have multiple system partitions. It complains that there isn't enough room for the selected packages (default load). There is room, but it complains nevertheless. Here's the error: "Not enough disk space. Remove some packages in the Single Selection" The screen said that 3.2-GB was required, but there was more than 50-GB available. I got around the error by just having one swap and one root partition. I configured the root partition and one of the data arrays with btrfs. The second data array was formatted as XFS. The test uses dd to copy a 4-GB binary file in ~root on the SSD disk to the btrfs array that contains 17576753152 1K-blocks as reported by df. The copy is repeated 4,000 times. The process is then repeated for the XFS array. Failure: The btrfs process failed when creating file #3688 when the file length truncated. But it went on to create 6 more truncated files after the initial failure, as shown here: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304000 Oct 15 23:37 test3686 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304000 Oct 15 23:37 test3687 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 938475520 Oct 15 23:38 test3688 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41943040 Oct 15 23:38 test3689 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 114294784 Oct 15 23:38 test3690 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2097152 Oct 15 23:38 test3691 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2097152 Oct 15 23:38 test3697 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2097152 Oct 15 23:38 test3703 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8388608 Oct 15 23:39 test3819 df shows this: /dev/sdb1 17576753152 15140885368 2434798528 87% /export/data0 While dd reported: dd: failed to open test3818: No space left on device So this is a rather messy failure. But the XFS formatted filesystem worked as expected. /dev/sdc1 17574666240 16384034856 1190631384 94% /export/data1 Times for the two process are: btrfs real 365m4.381s user 0m6.292s sys 128m51.396s XFS real 282m6.769s user 0m10.008s sys 177m24.177s Thus XFS seems to be faster by a fair margin, even when writing more data. Regards, Lew -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 8 months

[opensuse-factory] Features, features, we need features!

by Jos Poortvliet

Hi all, A reminder: if you have not added things to https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Major_features please do so! And go over it to review what's there if you can. Help your marketing team do great marketing! Hugs, J -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 8 months

[opensuse-factory] observations with 13.1RC1 (locate, mga)

by dieter

Hi, I have updated a real HW (32bit) from 12.3 to 13.1 RC1 with zypper dup. The upgrade was smooth. Some observations though: findutils-locate was replaced by mlocate. users who want to use locate have to be added to the group "locate". Probably this should be mentioned in the release notes. The new database /var/lib/mlocate/mlocate.db is only created when cron.daily is run. The old database /var/lib/locatedb is not deleted during the upgrade. BTW: the installed release notes still contain a lot of "CHECKIT:12.3". This machine has a matrox video card which worked fine with the mga driver in the previous openSUSE releases even when the performance got worse and worse because of degrading support for this HW. With 13.1RC1 it seems there is no signal (or not acceptable for the display) although the xserver starts and runs. I had to switch to the fbdev driver to get graphics back. On this system I can not reproduce https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834898 while I still see this with 13.1 RC1 64bit in a virtual machine. Regards, Dieter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 8 months

[opensuse-factory] 12.3 -> 13.1 RC1 upgrade removes all online repositories ; expected?

by Robert Munteanu

Hi, I did a test install of 12.3 using a DVD iso. I applied all available patches for 12.3 and then upgraded using another DVD iso - openSUSE-13.1-DVD-Build0041-x86_64.iso to be more precise. During the installation I recall that I was asked for what to to with the currently defined repos, and I left the default option - Remove. After the installation, I was only left with the 'DVD' repo. That is unexpected to me since the DVD installation properly set up the online repos. Is this expected behaviour of a bug to file? Thanks, Robert -- http://robert.muntea.nu/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 8 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

openSUSE Factory October 2013