[Review Request] python-GnuPG-Interface
Name: python-GnuPG-Interface Summary: GnuPG-Interface module for python URL: http://py-gnupg.sourceforge.net/ Version: 0.3.2 License: LGPL v2 or later Devproject: home:jimfunk Description:: GnuPGInterface is a Python module to interface with GnuPG. It concentrates on interacting with GnuPG via filehandles, providing access to control GnuPG via versatile and extensible means. Authors: Frank J. Tobin <ftobin@neverending.org> Applied Patches: None OpenSUSE Integration (init.d, SUSEconfig, permissions.d, etc): None Testing Status: Tested on x86_64 -- James Oakley jfunk@funktronics.ca -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
James Oakley wrote:
Name: python-GnuPG-Interface Summary: GnuPG-Interface module for python URL: http://py-gnupg.sourceforge.net/ Version: 0.3.2 License: LGPL v2 or later Devproject: home:jimfunk
Description:: GnuPGInterface is a Python module to interface with GnuPG. It concentrates on interacting with GnuPG via filehandles, providing access to control GnuPG via versatile and extensible means.
Authors: Frank J. Tobin <ftobin@neverending.org>
Applied Patches: None
OpenSUSE Integration (init.d, SUSEconfig, permissions.d, etc): None
Testing Status: Tested on x86_64
I'm not a python packaging expert, but the package looks OK to me. Latest release was in 2002, but I guess it's not a problem for a 200-line script ;). Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
James Oakley wrote:
Name: python-GnuPG-Interface Summary: GnuPG-Interface module for python URL: http://py-gnupg.sourceforge.net/ Version: 0.3.2 License: LGPL v2 or later Devproject: home:jimfunk
Description:: GnuPGInterface is a Python module to interface with GnuPG. It concentrates on interacting with GnuPG via filehandles, providing access to control GnuPG via versatile and extensible means.
Authors: Frank J. Tobin <ftobin@neverending.org>
Applied Patches: None
OpenSUSE Integration (init.d, SUSEconfig, permissions.d, etc): None
Testing Status: Tested on x86_64
I'm not a python packaging expert, but the package looks OK to me. Latest release was in 2002, but I guess it's not a problem for a 200-line script ;).
OK, If MMarek tested it, then it goes in. -- -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
I'm not a python packaging expert, but the package looks OK to me. Latest release was in 2002, but I guess it's not a problem for a 200-line script ;).
OK, If MMarek tested it, then it goes in.
Hmm, ok, can I add it then? I was hoping for a "I like it"/"I don't like it" comment on http://en.opensuse.org/Contrib/Adding_new_packages before we start. Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
I'm not a python packaging expert, but the package looks OK to me. Latest release was in 2002, but I guess it's not a problem for a 200-line script ;).
OK, If MMarek tested it, then it goes in.
Hmm, ok, can I add it then? I was hoping for a "I like it"/"I don't like it" comment on http://en.opensuse.org/Contrib/Adding_new_packages before we start.
I have already gave my comments regarding "Adding_new_packages" - and it basically was the same as it is now, with small clarifications (such as required test of LKMs on both architectures, and other small things)... So yes, we need to proceed. Yes, I like it. ============================================================= BTW: Packages that were in Factory can be included in "contrib" more easily. Perhaps KDE3 might get into contrib next year. -- -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
BTW: Packages that were in Factory can be included in "contrib" more easily. I have modified the wiki page to include a rule for Factory->Contrib package migration.
-- -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Alexey Eremenko <al4321@gmail.com> wrote:
BTW: Packages that were in Factory can be included in "contrib" more easily. I have modified the wiki page to include a rule for Factory->Contrib package migration.
I think there may be pretty major flow of packages from factory to contrib, this is why the requirements are lessened. -- -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Michal Marek wrote:
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
I'm not a python packaging expert, but the package looks OK to me. Latest release was in 2002, but I guess it's not a problem for a 200-line script ;).
OK, If MMarek tested it, then it goes in.
Hmm, ok, can I add it then? I was hoping for a "I like it"/"I don't like it" comment on http://en.opensuse.org/Contrib/Adding_new_packages before we start.
I like it. I think it should be added along with the others mentioned. - -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjbvrQACgkQVtBjDid73eZkIACeONydB9J52r1WTDM7B/pvFObh 8RUAn2gIP+Yc83tKT66ID+QAw4QJxMpl =EVDu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
Alexey Eremenko napsal(a):
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
I'm not a python packaging expert, but the package looks OK to me. Latest release was in 2002, but I guess it's not a problem for a 200-line script ;).
OK, If MMarek tested it, then it goes in.
OK, first contrib package... and fails due to an rpmlint bug :-( Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
James Oakley napsal(a):
Name: python-GnuPG-Interface Devproject: home:jimfunk
James, could you please remove this line <devel project="home:cthiel1:Factory"/> from the package metadata? home:cthiel1:Factory/python-GnuPG-Interface is a dead link to Factory and referring to it just confuses osc branch (should someone want to modify your package). thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
Michal Marek wrote:
James, could you please remove this line <devel project="home:cthiel1:Factory"/> from the package metadata? home:cthiel1:Factory/python-GnuPG-Interface is a dead link to Factory and referring to it just confuses osc branch (should someone want to modify your package).
I thought that sources will be in openSUSE:Factory:Contrib and all maintainers will have links to their home:*:Contrib projects, so they could create submitreq. Or am I wrong? -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol RUSNAK SUSE LINUX, s.r.o Package Maintainer Lihovarska 1060/12 PGP 0xA6917144 19000 Praha 9, CR prusnak[at]suse.cz http://www.suse.cz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
Pavol Rusnak napsal(a):
Michal Marek wrote:
James, could you please remove this line <devel project="home:cthiel1:Factory"/> from the package metadata? home:cthiel1:Factory/python-GnuPG-Interface is a dead link to Factory and referring to it just confuses osc branch (should someone want to modify your package).
I thought that sources will be in openSUSE:Factory:Contrib and all maintainers will have links to their home:*:Contrib projects, so they could create submitreq. Or am I wrong?
Yes, we will replace the links to home project with copies soon. But James' package metadata should be fixed independent of that :). Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 27 September 2008 06:17:35 Michal Marek wrote:
James Oakley napsal(a):
Name: python-GnuPG-Interface Devproject: home:jimfunk
James, could you please remove this line <devel project="home:cthiel1:Factory"/> from the package metadata? home:cthiel1:Factory/python-GnuPG-Interface is a dead link to Factory and referring to it just confuses osc branch (should someone want to modify your package).
Oops. I didn't realise those would stay in the metadata. Fixed in home:jimfunk and home:jimfunk:Contrib. -- James Oakley jfunk@funktronics.ca -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
participants (5)
-
Alexey Eremenko -
Boyd Lynn Gerber -
James Oakley -
Michal Marek -
Pavol Rusnak