On Tuesday 17 March 2009 07:54:57 Petr Uzel wrote:
> In fact, I don't actually think that it is completely disallowed to
> repackage a binary package (or it is???), but should be definitely
> avoided if 'normal' package can be made.
>
And, on the first place, its much better for packager that will have to patch
it. And you propably will :-). More over, if it is GPL, than you should
distribute sources anyway.
Petr