I still think graphics:modeling is better, in spite of it will hold packages for defining modeling, rendering, animating, or whatever. I also do not get why separate and distinguish 3d and 2d. It is kind of programmer approach IMHO, not user one.
I'd have to agree with this, maybe the 2D/3D separation thing is going a little *too* far... perhaps just focusing on the applications main group (like 'graphics/animation', 'graphics/modeling', 'graphics/rendering', etc) is enough ???
If there's no objections I'd be happy going this route.