Am Dienstag, 20. September 2011, 01:01:13 schrieb Rüdiger Meier:

> On Monday 19 September 2011, Lars Vogdt wrote:

> > > If there are any exceptions, why not one more?

> >

> > I would say: feel free to contact Intel and ask if you can get an

> > official approval for including the icc into the openSUSE Build

> > Service.

>

> I contacted them last week but still waiting for reply ...

>

> > All mentioned exceptions in OBS currently have a written down (and

> > legal approved) contract that allows us to put them into OBS.

>

> Just to clear it up.

> I'am sure Intel would never allow to make the icc available for all

> users without signing non-com. licences for every user. So never ever

> there could be an icc.rpm published.

That would be a problem, because we have no secure mechanics to disallow

download of binaries and to allow server side builds at the same time.

> But if Intel allows single users to use their own license on OBS (and it

> should be allowed IMO) when we could discuss whether OBS should allow

> packagers to do this or not.

> Publishing icc compiled packages is no problem I think. Of course I

> don't plan to have icc compiled packages within the standard distro. It

> would be just a benefit for developers to have another very good

> compiler available.

>

>

> cu,

> Rudi

--

Adrian Schroeter

SUSE Linux Products GmbH

email: adrian@suse.de