On 09/05/2019 03.14, Julio González Gil wrote:
Seems to me you are maybe affected by: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-announce@lists.fedoraproj...
Thanks! That was it. And in March they announced the final switch to 3.6: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-announce@lists.fedoraproj... I thought that the macros are wrong, and did not think of the possibility that EPEL would actually change it's python version.
After a small timeframe (not determined how long yet), the macros will change and python36 will be the main python3 in EPEL. As at the prjconfig you are forcing python34, that could explain it: Yeah, it is not so easy to get the specfiles compatible with openSUSE, Fedora and CentOS as CentOS uses a different naming scheme for packages and binaries. If so, I am not 100% sure, but maybe if you define %python3_pkgversion at the prjconfig to be 34, your problem will be fixed:
I now did it the other way round and switched the macros to Python 3.6, but now RHEL_7 has a problem :/ Sebastian
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts:Python3EPEL#Example_Spec
On miércoles, 8 de mayo de 2019 19:20:02 (CEST) Sebix wrote:
Dear list,
On my CentOS_7 builds on build.opensuse.org the %python3_sitelib/%python3_sitearch macros do not work anymore:
-bash-4.2$ rpmspec -E '%python3_sitelib' sh: /usr/bin/python3.6: No such file or directory
-bash-4.2$ rpmspec -E '%python3_sitearch' sh: /usr/bin/python3.6: No such file or directory
The correct binary would be python3.4
In the job history I see that there was a meta change at April 04, 2019 18:58 and the builds failed from this time on, e.g.: https://build.opensuse.org/packages/python3-psutil/job_history/home:sebix:in telmq/CentOS_7/x86_64 https://build.opensuse.org/packages/python3-imbox/job_history/home:sebix:in telmq/CentOS_7/x86_64
I guess that this is a configuration error, but I am not sure where (and by whom) this can be fixed.
Sebastian