April 2009 - openSUSE Build Service - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-buildservice] Fedora10/CentOS5 - error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
by Andrew Beekhof 14 Apr '09

14 Apr '09

Can someone please take a look at the following project/package: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log?arch=i586&package=heartbe… I get the above error, but only for the heartbeat package and only for some distros (even some that used to work) - it doesn't make any sense. I've triple checked that there is no reference to debuginfo in heartbeat.spec and have even turned it off in the project's metadata - but it still complains: + exec rpmbuild -ba --define '_srcdefattr (-,root,root)' --eval %suse_insert_debug_package /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/heartbeat.spec error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] about submitreq 8029
by Christian 12 Apr '09

12 Apr '09

Hi, there is no accept/decline. Is "lmuelle" still alive ? Can anyone help out ? Kind Regards Chris -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-buildservice] obs-server and sign
by Christian 10 Apr '09

10 Apr '09

Hi, with version 1.5.1 I recognized that permission of /usr/bin/sign has changed from 4750 to 0750. So where do you place the ".phrases" DIR ? On my local obs it is placed here: /root/.phrases (as defined in /etc/sign.conf) I had to reset it to 4750. Otherwise sign will fail with "Permission denied" Kind Regards Chris -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] Debian 5.0 tar.bz2 problem?
by Thomas Anders 10 Apr '09

10 Apr '09

While I'm successfully building packages (e.g. net-snmp/net-snmp-main-snapshot) in OBS for Debian 4.0 with <package>.dsc, <package>.tar.bz2 and debian.tar.gz, the very same packages fail to build in OBS for Debian 5.0: - --- snip --- dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package (/usr/src/packages/SOURCES.DEB/net-snmp_5.4.2.1+svn200904090230.dsc) dpkg-source: extracting net-snmp in /usr/src/packages/BUILD dpkg-source: error: unrecognized file for a v1.0 source package: net-snmp_5.4.2.1+svn200904090230.orig.tar.bz2 - --- snap --- The build for Debian 4.0 does this step just fine: - --- snip --- dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package (/usr/src/packages/SOURCES.DEB/net-snmp_5.4.2.1+svn200904090230.dsc) dpkg-source: extracting net-snmp in /usr/src/packages/BUILD dpkg-source: unpacking net-snmp_5.4.2.1+svn200904090230.orig.tar.bz2 dpkg-source: applying /usr/src/packages/SOURCES.DEB/net-snmp_5.4.2.1+svn200904090230.diff.gz [...] - --- snap --- What's wrong with the Debian 5.0 builds? +Thomas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-buildservice] GSoC '09 proposal - git backend for OBS
by Peter Libič 09 Apr '09

09 Apr '09

Hi Folks! In the opensuse-packaging ML (http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2009-03/msg00040.html) Peter Poeml encouraged people to try to hack BuildService so it would use git as its source server. I would like to work on this git backend for OBS during this year's Google Summer of Code. The idea is described here: http://en.opensuse.org/Summer_of_Code_2009#prototype_git_backend_for_OBS. As Brandon Philips correctly stated the main goal is not to provide the full-blown git integration into BuildService, but rather to create working OBS instance that uses git for storing the source files instead of currently used BSDB solution. It should be a prototype, with which we could make tests later and see the advantages (and disadvantages) of the git approach. A part of the solution is also a conversion tool which will convert sources stored in BSDB into git repositories, so the migration wouldn't be very painful. Vivid advantages of the git approach are: - standard VCS operations like diff, log or commit are offline - this decreases the server load and one could work without the network access - import/export between OBS instances is easier - gitweb allows comfortable (and anonymous) source revision browsing I am aware of the fact that only changing the backend from BSDB to git is not all what needs to be done if we want the mainline switched to git. Therefore, after successful implementation I'd like to continue to work with the OBS team on possible integration. Do you have any suggestions or hints before the project starts? Regards, Peter Libic -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

6 5

[opensuse-buildservice] Introducing osc-plugin-overview
by Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett 09 Apr '09

09 Apr '09

You maintain some packages in your repository, which you package from some upstream source. You want to quickly compare versions across your development project, Factory, and upstream. You want to configure what is the package list and to display packages only if they are outdated. You want to configure a view writing myview.ini to ~/.osc-overview which says something like: [myview] repos=obs://devel:languages:ruby:extensions,gem://gems.rubyforge.org # get package list from one of the repos (can also specify manually a list with commas) packages=$1 # show a row only if this column is older than other columns filter.older=$1 And you want to type “osc overview myview” and get back something like this table: http://www.suse.de/~dmacvicar/screenshots/osc-plugin-overview/osc-plugin-ov… You can configure as many package data sources as you want for a view. No limit for 2 columns. You can specify from which repo the package list comes from using the $x macros. Same with the older version filter. Then osc-plugin-overview may be what you are looking for, or even better, it may be soon, when we add more features. See more complete description, where to download it and planned features in its wiki webpage. http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service/osc_plugins/Overview This is the first release so it includes support for getting information from build service projects, submit requests against projects, upstream gem servers and that is. I expect to add stuff like customizable output (machine readable, patchnfo, changes, diff) and other sources like local directories and upstream ftp servers. My main goal is to use it for ZYpp maintenance updates, therefore patchinfo generation is my own goal, but I am sure other cool stuff can be done for other workflows Help welcomed! -- Duncan Mac-Vicar P. - Engineering Manager, YaST SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-buildservice] OBS: ARM builds activated in build.o.o - and working
by Martin Mohring 09 Apr '09

09 Apr '09

Hi, this is another historical moment for OBS development: - Debian Lenny @ ARM is accessable - ARM schedulers are on - the first ARM repos have been activated - some 20+ packages have build successfully for ARM now - we make progress with the openSUSE @ ARM Cheers, Martin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] Why are Debian an xUbuntu excluded on my builds?
by Greg Freemyer 08 Apr '09

08 Apr '09

All, Continuieing to work on my first project. I have a very simple spec file: https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=open2300.spec&package=ope… I have OpenSuse and Fedora building without error. But I've tried to add one of the Debians and one of the xUbuntus. With both the build failed with a status of "excluded" and no log was generated. Is there another specfile clause I need to allow those to try and build? Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer Head of EDD Tape Extraction and Processing team Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

4 5

[opensuse-buildservice] unknown version on submit request
by Duncan Mac-Vicar P. 08 Apr '09

08 Apr '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Right now, there is a sr from wine ( I use this as an example ) 8624 new (msmeissn) home:msmeissn:Factory/wine -> openSUSE:Factory 'update to 1.1.18' However, if you look for that revision on the source project, version appear as unknown. Why? https://api.opensuse.org/source/home:msmeissn:Factory/wine/_history <revisionlist> − <revision rev="1" vrev="1"> <srcmd5>b4c666e95ac5814cf0e73f62af16d134</srcmd5> <version>unknown</version> <time>1213002992</time> <user>unknown</user> </revision> − <revision rev="2" vrev="2"> <srcmd5>91c126c242b30a749d222fbfb41c2d7d</srcmd5> <version>unknown</version> <time>1238704207</time> <user>msmeissn</user> − <comment> - - Updated to upstream 1.1.18 - Joystick support on Mac OS X. - Implementation of iphlpapi on Solaris. - A number of 64-bit improvements. - Obsolete LinuxThreads support has been removed. - Many fixes to the regression tests on Windows. - Various bug fixes. </comment> </revision> </revisionlist> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknadiwACgkQzR62qWZ+QtFx5gCgqX73RPnNNZNjW8u08FOObnKD c5EAn34/19/vrqTREj/+ZQi8CzeE2wTi =sJU5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-buildservice] Fwd: [obs submit-request 8754] KDE:KDE4:Factory:Desktop/ktorrent: created by mrdocs
by Kevin James 08 Apr '09

08 Apr '09

Hi, I got sent this, but I have nothing to do with this project (as far as I know..) - should this have gone to someone else? Cheers, KEv. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: mrdocs(a)opensuse.org > Date: 6 April 2009 22:52:32 GMT+02:00 > To: kjames(a)novell.com > Subject: [obs submit-request 8754] KDE:KDE4:Factory:Desktop/ > ktorrent: created by mrdocs > Reply-To: mrdocs(a)opensuse.org > > > > home:mrdocs:branches:KDE:KDE4:Factory:Desktop/ktorrent -> > KDE:KDE4:Factory:Desktop/ktorrent > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=ktorrent&project=home:mrdoc… > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=ktorrent&project=KDE:KDE4:F… > > Description: undefined > > Source revision md5: 5f1eb1ecc3223bc1a078a63cdd4f6055 > > To REVIEW against the previous version: > osc submitreq show --diff 8754 > > To ACCEPT the request: > osc submitreq accept 8754 --message="reviewed ok." > > To DECLINE the request: > osc submitreq decline 8754 --message="declined for reason xyz > (see ... for background / policy / ...)." > > To REVOKE the request: > osc submitreq revoke 8754 --message="retracted because ..., > sorry / thx / see better version ..." > > -- > Hermes messaging (http://hermes.opensuse.org) > openSUSE Build Service (https://build.opensuse.org/) > Collaboration: http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service/Collaboration >

4 3