http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091097 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091097#c11

Michal Kubeček mkubecek@suse.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment #7 is|1 |0 private| |

--- Comment #11 from Michal Kubeček mkubecek@suse.com --- (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #10)

IMO kernel-default-base should be the same as kernel-default but just exclude support for physical hardware. Anything else is just asking for trouble. I can definitely see use-cases for 9pfs in production.

Sounds like you are still assuming kernel-*-base subpackage was designed for use in general purpose VMs. AFAIK this is not true, even package description says something very different. What you want is rather closer to -ec2 flavor we have had earlier or kvmsmall config recently introduced in newer branches (it is meant for developer use but it's probably closer to your idea what -base subpackage should be than actual -base). Therefore my suggestions from comment 7.