[Bug 547578] New: Pure-FTPD fails to recognize PassivePortRange Option in /etc/pure-ftpd/pure-ftpd.conf
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578 User martin@rhm.de added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c465954 Summary: Pure-FTPD fails to recognize PassivePortRange Option in /etc/pure-ftpd/pure-ftpd.conf Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: RC 1 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Network AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: martin@rhm.de QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090909 SUSE/3.5.3-1.3 Firefox/3.5.3 Follow-up bug for #465954. The fix proposed there is not working anymore, or to be more specific: one has to revert the 11.1 fix for 11.2 in order to get pure-ftpd to honor the PassivePortRange setting. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Add PassivePortRange 30000:35000 to /etc/pure-ftpd/pure-ftpd.conf 2. /usr/sbin/pure-config-args /etc/pure-ftpd/pure-ftpd.conf Actual Results: Output does not include -p 30000:35000 Expected Results: Output should include -p 30000:35000 Editing /etc/sbin/pure-config-args to move PassivePortRange => "-p" back from numpairc_switch_for to numpairb_switch_for. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
Andreas Jaeger
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
Stephan Kulow
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c
Hendrik Vogelsang
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c2
Michal Seben
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c3
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jungowski
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c4
Martin Jungowski
martin/rebd$ cat /usr/sbin/pure-config-args | grep numpair -A5 my %numpairb_switch_for = ( LimitRecursion => "-L", AnonymousRatio => "-q", UserRatio => "-Q", # PassivePortRange => "-p", ); -- my %numpairc_switch_for = ( Umask => "-U", Quota => "-n", PerUserLimits => "-y", PassivePortRange => "-p", ); martin/rebd$ /usr/sbin/pure-config-args /etc/pure-ftpd/pure-ftpd.conf -A -c10 -B -C3 -z -D -E -fftp -H -I14 -lldap:/etc/pure-ftpd/pureftpd-ldapconf -lpam -L2000:8 -m4 -s -U177:077 -u40 -x -r -i -j -k99 -G -Z -Y1
But:
martin/rebd$ cat /usr/sbin/pure-config-args | grep numpair -A5 my %numpairb_switch_for = ( LimitRecursion => "-L", AnonymousRatio => "-q", UserRatio => "-Q", PassivePortRange => "-p", ); -- my %numpairc_switch_for = ( Umask => "-U", Quota => "-n", PerUserLimits => "-y", # PassivePortRange => "-p", ); martin/rebd$ /usr/sbin/pure-config-args /etc/pure-ftpd/pure-ftpd.conf -A -c10 -B -C3 -z -D -E -fftp -H -I14 -lldap:/etc/pure-ftpd/pureftpd-ldapconf -lpam -L2000:8 -m4 -s -U177:077 -u40 -x -r -i -j -k99 -G -Z -p60000:63000 -Y1
I first encountered this in 11.2 Beta M7 or M8, not quite sure which one. It still seems to be present in 11.2 Final, since I still have to move PassivePortRange back from numpairc_switch_for to numpairb_switch_for in order for it to be recognized -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c5
--- Comment #5 from Michal Seben
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c
Anja Stock
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c7
Marcus Meissner
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c8
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c9
Marcus Meissner
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c10
Anja Stock
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c11
Michal Seben
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c12
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c13
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c15
Michal Seben
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c17
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c18
Christian Dengler
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c19
--- Comment #19 from Darcy Partridge
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c20
Marcus Meissner
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c21
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c22
Michal Seben
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547578#c23
--- Comment #23 from Bernhard Wiedemann
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com