https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
Summary: kernel cash caused by xorg with two DH Matrox G550 Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Alpha 5 Platform: i586 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: X.Org AssignedTo: sndirsch@novell.com ReportedBy: lauffer@ph-freiburg.de QAContact: sndirsch@novell.com
My "quad head setup" with two G550 DH (one AGP card, one PCI) worked fine for a long time. But since the xorg-x11-server-6.9.0-50.17 update SL-10.1 update the machine crashes during the start of X11. This bug is in OSS-10.2Alpha5, two.
I see there no error logs from the kernel crash (console on ttyS) and no errors logged by the xserver (-verbose 9).
The related part of the xorg.conf:
<<snip>> [...]
Section "Module" Load "type1" Load "dbe" Load "freetype" Load "glx" Load "v4l" Load "extmod" EndSection
Section "Device" BoardName "G550" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" Driver "mga" Identifier "Device[0]" Option "hwcursor" "on" Option "MGASDRAM" "off" Chipset "mgag550" VideoRam 32768 Screen 0 VendorName "Matrox" EndSection
Section "Device" BoardName "G550" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" Driver "mga" Identifier "Device[1]" Option "hwcursor" "on" Option "MGASDRAM" "off" Chipset "mgag550" VideoRam 32768 Screen 1 VendorName "Matrox" EndSection
Section "Device" BoardName "G550" BusID "PCI:3:0:0" Driver "mga" Identifier "Device[2]" Option "hwcursor" "on" Option "MGASDRAM" "off" Chipset "mgag550" VideoRam 32768 Screen 0 VendorName "Matrox" EndSection
Section "Device" BoardName "G550" BusID "PCI:3:0:0" Driver "mga" Identifier "Device[2]" Option "hwcursor" "on" Option "MGASDRAM" "off" Chipset "mgag550" VideoRam 32768 Screen 1 VendorName "Matrox" EndSection
[...]
<<snap>>
How can I help?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #1 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2006-10-09 06:03 MST ------- sorry for my cut&past failure above... indeed the last device has the Identifier "Device[3]" and not 2.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Comment #2 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-10-09 06:29 MST ------- Changes in xorg-x11-server-6.9.0-50.17 since xorg-x11-server from 10.1:
* Do Jun 29 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - p_ia64-console.diff: * fixes MCA after start of second Xserver (Bug #177011)
* Mi Jun 28 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - p_initialize-pci-tag.diff: * initialize PCI tag correctly, which is used by an IA64 specific patch (see Bug #147261 for details); fixes Xserver crashes with fglrx driver - and possibly other drivers like vesa - during initial startup (!), VT switch and startup of second Xserver (SLED10 Blocker Bugs #180535, #170991, #158806)
* Do Jun 08 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - p_xnest-ignore-getimage-errors.diff: * ignores the X error on GetImage in Xnest (Bug #174228)
* Fr Jun 02 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - pc_xf86-pci.diff: * fixes broken BIOS reading (due to changes in recent Linux kernels), which is required for dual card support (Bug #171453, X.Org Bug #6751) - removed no longer required patch "p_xlib_skip_select_substructure_redirect.diff" again (Bug #151836)
* Mi Mai 31 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - generate /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.dir on s390/s390x during %install (Bug #178315)
* Di Mai 30 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - fixed check for empty /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.dir (Bug #178315)
* Mo Mai 29 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - p_xlib_skip_select_substructure_redirect.diff: * fool java swing apps that no WM is running (Bug #151836)
* Mo Mai 22 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - p_xlib_skip_ext_env.diff: * added support for disabling extensions through environment variables (Bug #167317) - no longer remove NVIDIA installer in %pre of xorg-x11-server-glx, since it's no longer conflicting with the NVIDIA driver package (Bug #175683) - make sure that /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.dir is not empty (Bug #178315)
* Fr Mai 19 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - /etc/X11/xdm/Xsetup: * start compiz on gdm when GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is available to fix horrible performance (Bug #173901)
* Do Mai 11 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - p_pci-legacy-mmap.diff: * fixes legacy area mapping on IA64 (Bug #166112) - p_xorg-fbcompose-radek2.diff: * fixes massive Xrender corruption (Bug #152730, X.Org Bug #6827)
* Di Mai 09 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - %post of xorg-x11-server: "/dev/mouse" --> "/dev/input/mice" in /etc/X11/xorg.conf (Bug #172260)
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #3 from mhopf@novell.com 2006-10-09 06:33 MST ------- Hm. This *could* be a broken IA64 patch I'm currently working on. However, this is just a rough idea...
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |lauffer@ph-freiburg.de
------- Comment #4 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-10-09 06:39 MST ------- Candidates are: - p_ia64-console.diff - p_initialize-pci-tag.diff - pc_xf86-pci.diff
My favorite is pc_xf86-pci.diff. Could you also attach /var/log/Xorg.0.log for the original xorg-x11-server RPM from the CD/DVD *and* for the 6.9.0-50.17 one? I hope to see some interesting differences in the output. Thanks.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #5 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2006-10-10 04:26 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=101099) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=101099&action=view) Xorg.0.log with x11-org-server-6.9.0-48
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
lauffer@ph-freiburg.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED
------- Comment #6 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2006-10-10 04:28 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=101100) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=101100&action=view) Xorg.0.log with x11-org-server-6.9.0-50.17
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #7 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2006-10-10 04:29 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=101101) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=101101&action=view) output of the lspci -vv command
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #8 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2006-10-10 04:31 MST ------- Ok, it got some new informations - logs see in #5, #6 and #7
The "crash" is more like getting an unusable system: - If the machine is in init 3 and if I start '/usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg -verbose 9' with the 6.9.0-50.17 my eth device sucks - the machine is getting in a "unusable state", BUT i/o on hdd device is ok AND Xorg is comming up! - If the machine is in init 3 and switching to init 5... I see there no comming up X and the machine looks like crashed (no keybord response, no ping replies..., blank screens).
If I only start Xorg (like the 1st example above) and keep my eyes on ping I see something like this: lisa:~ # ping www.suse.de [...] 64 bytes from turing.suse.de (195.135.220.3): icmp_seq=114 ttl=54 time=24.8 ms ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available [...]
Breaking this ping process and restarting gives me an "Destination Host Unreachable". But I can bring the interface down, rmmod the eth module and reload this... followed by this loginformation from /var/log/warn: Oct 10 11:53:40 lisa kernel: PCI: Enabling device 0000:02:0b.0 (0000 -> 0003) Oct 10 11:53:40 lisa kernel: e100: 0000:02:0b.0: e100_eeprom_load: EEPROM corrupted Oct 10 11:53:40 lisa kernel: e100: probe of 0000:02:0b.0 failed with error -11
During a normal boot and insmod I got this info for e100...: lisa:~ # dmesg | grep e100 e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.5.10-k2-NAPI e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2005 Intel Corporation e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xef800000, irq 6, MAC addr 00:02:B3:B8:20:7A e100: eth0: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex
The log files... #5 Working X, see log from /var/log/Xorg.0.log in Xorg.0.log-6.9.0-48 #6 Trouble-X, see log from /var/log/Xorg.0.log in Xorg.0.log-6.9.0-50.17 #7 'lspci -vv' output in lspci-vv.txt
greetings!
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eich@novell.com Priority|P5 - None |P2 - High
------- Comment #9 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-10-10 04:48 MST ------- Oh well. :-(
--- Xorg.0.log-6.9.0-48 2006-10-10 12:31:56.000000000 +0200 +++ Xorg.0.log-6.9.0-50.17 2006-10-10 12:31:46.000000000 +0200 [...] -Requesting insufficient memory window!: start: 0xf0800000 end: 0xf1efffff size 0x2000000 -(EE) Cannot find empty range to map base to -(WW) MGA(0): Video BIOS info block not detected! +(II) Truncating PCI BIOS Length to 36864 +(--) MGA(0): Video BIOS info block at offset 0x07CE0 [...] -(--) MGA(0): Max pixel clock is 600 MHz +(--) MGA(0): Max pixel clock is 1200 MHz [...] -(II) MGA(0): Clock range: 12.00 to 600.00 MHz +(II) MGA(0): Clock range: 12.00 to 1200.00 MHz
Probably some bogus broken BIOS values are used now ...
I think this is related to "pc_xf86-pci.diff" patch, which needs to be verified first.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|kernel cash caused by xorg |kernel crash caused by xorg with two DH Matrox |with two DH Matrox G550 |G550
------- Comment #10 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-10-10 04:57 MST ------- I'll attach a RPM without this patch for testing ASAP.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #11 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-10-10 06:06 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=101111) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=101111&action=view) xorg-x11-server-6.9.0-50.24.i586.rpm
RPM for testing.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |lauffer@ph-freiburg.de
------- Comment #12 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-10-10 06:06 MST ------- Please give it a try.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
lauffer@ph-freiburg.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED
------- Comment #13 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2006-10-10 06:54 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=101117) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=101117&action=view) Xorg.0.log correspondingto xorg--x11-server rpm from #11
still having problems with the nic (the eth0 is dead), but the diff between the xorg logs of build 48 and your 50.24 from #11 shows less changes... hm...
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |lauffer@ph-freiburg.de
------- Comment #14 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-10-10 07:14 MST ------- So does it fix the initial problem?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
lauffer@ph-freiburg.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|lauffer@ph-freiburg.de |
------- Comment #15 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2006-10-10 07:33 MST ------- Yes, it fixes the crash of the whole system! Now I can start X/KDE with the 2*2 head setup. :)
The new Xorg now only crashes the ethernet controller. This problem is still open: PCI: Enabling device 0000:02:0b.0 (0000 -> 0003) kernel: e100: 0000:02:0b.0: e100_eeprom_load: EEPROM corrupted kernel: e100: probe of 0000:02:0b.0 failed with error
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P2 - High |P3 - Medium
------- Comment #16 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-10-10 07:58 MST ------- (In reply to comment #15)
Yes, it fixes the crash of the whole system! Now I can start X/KDE with the 2*2 head setup. :)
Ok. Unfortunately it's no an option to simply remove this patch again. See Bug #171453, X.Org Bug #6751.
The new Xorg now only crashes the ethernet controller. This problem is still open: PCI: Enabling device 0000:02:0b.0 (0000 -> 0003) kernel: e100: 0000:02:0b.0: e100_eeprom_load: EEPROM corrupted kernel: e100: probe of 0000:02:0b.0 failed with error
I think this is a different issue.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |eich@novell.com
------- Comment #17 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-10-22 09:54 MST ------- Egbert, any ideas what's wrong with pc_xf86-pci.diff. At least it breaks Matrox Dualhcard support. :-(
* Fr Jun 02 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de - pc_xf86-pci.diff: * fixes broken BIOS reading (due to changes in recent Linux kernels), which is required for dual card support ( Bug #171453, X.Org Bug #6751)
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |olh@novell.com
------- Comment #18 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-10-23 05:21 MST ------- *** Bug 184002 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #19 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-11-29 17:07 MST ------- Egbert?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #20 from eich@novell.com 2006-11-30 02:00 MST -------
(In reply to comment #15) The new Xorg now only crashes the ethernet controller. This problem is still
open: PCI: Enabling device 0000:02:0b.0 (0000 -> 0003) kernel: e100: 0000:02:0b.0: e100_eeprom_load: EEPROM corrupted kernel: e100: probe of 0000:02:0b.0 failed with error
This is a boot message - right? If so it would get generated before X is started. Do you still see the ethernet lockups after you start X or do you only get this message? If yes - please test with a bare Xserver: just run 'X' from a root console in runlvl 3.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #21 from eich@novell.com 2006-11-30 02:03 MST ------- (In reply to comment #17)
Egbert, any ideas what's wrong with pc_xf86-pci.diff. At least it breaks Matrox Dualhcard support. :-(
Your assumption about the BIOS seems plausible. For testing we could provide a patched driver which ignores the BIOS table.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #22 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2006-11-30 02:11 MST ------- (In reply to comment #20) Egbert: The e100 error was not a boot message, it was caused after starting the X server. Booting in runlevel 3 and all worked fine.
You can give me a patched version and I'll give it a try. But it could take about some hours until I can test it here.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #23 from eich@novell.com 2006-11-30 04:05 MST ------- Stephan: would you please run lspci -v a. before you start X, b: while X is running c: after you have terminated X. Does your network come back after you take down X?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Info Provider|eich@novell.com |lauffer@ph-freiburg.de
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
eich@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Info Provider|lauffer@ph-freiburg.de |eich@novell.com
------- Comment #24 from eich@novell.com 2006-11-30 04:32 MST ------- The EEPROM data is loaded when the driver is initialized. Usually network drivers are initialized before X starts. I do not now of any reason why the startup of X does a reinitialization of the network device. I've run accross this checksum problem on Intel NICs before. Infact I've reported a bug on this -> #57976. The problem was unrelated to any X activeties.
Stephan: can you verify that the message appears also when you have booted in runlvl 3, logged into a console as root and started a bare Xserver as described in attachment #21?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #25 from eich@novell.com 2006-11-30 04:39 MST ------- Err, I ment to say: comment #21. Bug #57976 and #177440 have some information what can be done to fix the eeprom issue.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Info Provider|eich@novell.com |lauffer@ph-freiburg.de
------- Comment #26 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-12-19 14:40 MST ------- Stephan, any comments on Egbert's questions?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #27 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2006-12-20 01:00 MST ------- Sorry, not now. Some weeks ago I plugged out the 2nd card and this card is in use in another machine since this date. I'm waiting for the delivery of an ordered PNY Quadro4 440 NVS card. As soon as this card arrives here, I can play with this stuff and start new testings. But I guess it will be january... is this to late (I will not forget the test)?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #28 from sndirsch@novell.com 2006-12-20 02:54 MST ------- That's ok. :-)
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #29 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2007-01-11 06:08 MST ------- Ok, back on bug 21098 with a dedicated test machine (same hardware as before). You can get full root access if you like...
Here the test results for Egbert (see #24) in short, the complete lscpi logs will be send in some mimutes.
I really wonder why the old test I did in #13 and #15 (with the test rpm xorg-x11-server-6.9.0-50.24.i586.rpm in #11 from stefan) did NOT crash while not i crashes the host!
I made these teste with several xorg-x11 SL-10.1 packes: -------------------------------------------------------- 1. Boot in runlevel 3 2. lspci -v > <file...>-0 3. X -verbose 1 4. lspci -v > <file...>-1 5. kill the X from 3. 6. lspci -v <file...>-2
I made these test above (as far as possible) with the following SL-10.1 xorg installations: a) xorg in the installation from the first/final SL-10.1 ftp release b) ...with the xorg-x11-driver-video update with patch level 46.15 c) ...with the xorg-x11-driver-video update with patch level 46.20 d) ...with the xorg update packages patch level 50.17 -> Important note: This was the last working X installation! After starting (and killing) X the ethernet card becomes "unusable"! e) ...with... 50.20 f) ...with... 50.24 g) ...with... stefans patched xorg-x11-server 50.24 from #11
In all the tests a..g the "interuptmopde" in the bios was "APIC". So I started some more tests with the "PIC" mode. But there it wasn't something other than in the apic mode.
Ok... wait some minutes, I'll upload a tgz with the lspci outputs.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
lauffer@ph-freiburg.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|lauffer@ph-freiburg.de |
------- Comment #30 from lauffer@ph-freiburg.de 2007-01-11 06:21 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=112449) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=112449&action=view) tgz with a lot ow 'lspci -v' results - see #29
Filenames <-> comment:
lspci-50.17-0 <-> patch level 50.17, runlevel 3 lspci-50.17-1 <-> dito, X has been started lspci-50.17-2 <-> ... X has been stopped
lspci-50.20-0, lspci-50.24-0, lspci-patched-package-bug-210988-50.24-0 <-> lscpi before starting X, host freezes/crashes after start
Other files:
lspci-50.24-pic-old_video-driver-46-0 <-> SL-10.1 final with no video-driver updates but the latest server.
lspci-patched-package-bug-210988-50.24-pic-old_video-driver-46-0 <-> SL-10.1 final with no video-driver updates but the patched server from stefan (see #11)
And some other files with the "PIC" (not "APIC") mode. These files has "pic" in the filename.
Poorly you will not see big differences in all these lspci outputs but I made them all the not have some still opened questions in this case.
(don't forget my note in #29: I can grant you a root login on this dedicated test machine...)
Greetings, Stephan
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |eich@novell.com
------- Comment #31 from sndirsch@novell.com 2007-01-11 09:19 MST ------- Egbert, could you comment on the Stephan's investigations triggered by your qeustions? Thanks.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #32 from sndirsch@novell.com 2007-01-30 13:35 MST ------- Egbert?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #34 from sndirsch@novell.com 2007-02-12 07:47 MST ------- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:42:22 +0100 From: Stephan Lauffer lauffer@ph-freiburg.de To: sndirsch@novell.com Subject: Re: [Bug 210988] kernel crash caused by xorg with two DH Matrox G550
------- Comment #32 from sndirsch@novell.com 2007-01-30 13:35 MST ------- Egbert?
Hallole!
Du, also... ich hab einfach damals aufgegeben und mir ne Quad-Karte mit nVidia Chipsatzt gekauft. Ich weiss nich, ob ihr die Sache wirklich noch tief untersuchen wollt. Ich koennt die Testkiste auch fuer andere Sachen "miss-"brauchen. Also falls das euch nich so wichtig iss... dann bau ich die idle Kiste (immerhin p4 mit 1gb ram) ab. ich kann dann halt nimmer gross behilflich sein... was meinst?
-- Liebe Gruesse, with best regards Stephan Lauffer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED Info Provider|eich@novell.com | Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Comment #35 from sndirsch@novell.com 2007-02-12 07:49 MST ------- finally closing as WONTFIX.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
eich@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX |
------- Comment #36 from eich@novell.com 2007-02-15 07:27 MST ------- I will never get a chance to look at this one if it's closed. reopening to assign to myself.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
eich@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sndirsch@novell.com |eich@novell.com Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED Priority|P3 - Medium |P5 - None
------- Comment #37 from eich@novell.com 2007-02-15 07:28 MST ------- Adjusting priority.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #38 from sndirsch@novell.com 2007-02-15 07:39 MST ------- So you have two G550 cards? One of them PCI? Otherwise I'm afraid you can't investigate this issue.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
------- Comment #39 from eich@novell.com 2007-02-15 12:09 MST ------- No, but I haven't had a chance to look at the pile of logs attached here.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
eich@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Normal |Enhancement
------- Comment #40 from eich@novell.com 2007-04-30 03:21 MST ------- Let's reduce the priority on this one for now.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhopf@novell.com, sndirsch@novell.com
------- Comment #41 from sndirsch@novell.com 2007-05-12 04:42 MST ------- JFYI, Matthias. This is a bugreport, which is assigned to Egbert/me or with Egbert/me in CC or reported by Egbert/me.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|kernel crash caused by xorg |mga: kernel crash caused by xorg with two DH |with two DH Matrox G550 |Matrox G550
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|sndirsch@novell.com |xorg-maintainer-bugs@forge.provo.novell.com
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
User sndirsch@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988#c42
Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sndirsch@novell.com
--- Comment #42 from Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com 2008-04-16 07:33:34 MST --- (In reply to comment #17 from Stefan Dirsch)
Egbert, any ideas what's wrong with pc_xf86-pci.diff. At least it breaks Matrox Dualhcard support. :-(
- Fr Jun 02 2006 - sndirsch@suse.de
- pc_xf86-pci.diff:
kernels), which is required for dual card support ( Bug #171453, X.Org Bug #6751)
- fixes broken BIOS reading (due to changes in recent Linux
This patch no longer exists in 10.2. I suggest to test first if this issue still exists with openSUSE 11.0 before investigating it. Meanwhile I have pile of PCI G450 cards here.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
User sndirsch@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988#c43
--- Comment #43 from Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com 2008-04-16 09:00:43 MST --- There's no kernel crash any more happening, but X hangs here:
(--) MGA(0): Chipset: "mgag400" (G450) (==) MGA(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32 (==) MGA(0): RGB weight 888 (II) Loading sub module "int10" (II) LoadModule: "int10" (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules//libint10.so (II) Module int10: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.4.0.90, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 2.0 (II) MGA(0): Initializing int10
This is on x86_64. I'll attach the truncated logfile.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
User sndirsch@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988#c44
--- Comment #44 from Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com 2008-04-16 09:03:33 MST --- Created an attachment (id=208351) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=208351) Xorg.99.log
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
User sndirsch@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988#c45
--- Comment #45 from Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com 2008-04-16 09:04:04 MST --- Created an attachment (id=208352) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=208352) sysdata-22229
xorg.conf
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|mga: kernel crash caused by xorg with two DH |mga: Xserver hangs in int10 with two DH Matrox |Matrox G550 |G550 cards
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
User sndirsch@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988#c46
--- Comment #46 from Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com 2008-04-16 10:24:35 MST --- Marcus is currently working on a similar bug --> Bug #380298.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
User sndirsch@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988#c47
Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|eich@novell.com |lverhaegen@novell.com Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--- Comment #47 from Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com 2008-04-19 15:23:49 MST --- This one sounds well suited for Luc
1. Old hardware 2. Exotic setup (Multicard)
:-)
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
User sndirsch@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988#c53
--- Comment #53 from Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com 2008-07-19 06:38:01 MDT --- (In reply to comment #52 from Stefan Dirsch)
Implementing enhancement Bug #381644 would resolve this issue as well.
done.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210988
Stefan Dirsch sndirsch@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P4 - Low
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com