[Bug 1159131] New: icu: follow upstream soname again?
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131 Bug ID: 1159131 Summary: icu: follow upstream soname again? Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: jengelh@inai.de Reporter: lnussel@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de CC: qzhao@suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- according to bug 824262 from 2013 icu was switched to a custom soname as upstream was not considered reliable enough to get it right. Looks like meanwhile it's safe when they release a .something version: https://abi-laboratory.pro/?view=timeline&l=icu4c So can we go back to using the upstream soname? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131#c1
--- Comment #1 from Jan Engelhardt
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131#c2
--- Comment #2 from Ludwig Nussel
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131#c3
--- Comment #3 from Jan Engelhardt
maybe put utf8 in the name of the lib
That brings no improvement to my table. Unlike the ICU hack we are doing here, wxWidgets for example has around 300 *official* configure switches that influence the ABI, and no one is suggesting they encode those choices into the filename. It would become ridicolously long. So no one does that. There is still the matter that different vendors produce different ABIs, so it seems natural to use a tag that includes the vendor's name. Such is reasonably unique and is not going to get used willingly by another vendor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131#c4
--- Comment #4 from Ludwig Nussel
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131#c5
--- Comment #5 from Ludwig Nussel
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131
Jan Engelhardt
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131#c7
--- Comment #7 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131#c15
--- Comment #15 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159131#c16
--- Comment #16 from Swamp Workflow Management
participants (2)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com
-
bugzilla_noreply@suse.com