http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936416 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936416#c1 Dominique Leuenberger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |dimstar@opensuse.org Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Dominique Leuenberger --- There is no harfbuzz-devel-32bit (intentionally, as not needed). Only the shared libraries themselves are provided as -32bit; harfbuzz-devel-0.9.40-4.2.i586.rpm (the 'real' 32bit rpm) comes with the respective .so symlinks, as expected. If I mis-understood the report, please specify which package versions you talk about, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936416 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936416#c3 Francois Gouget changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |fgouget@codeweavers.com Resolution|WONTFIX |--- --- Comment #3 from Francois Gouget --- Installing harfbuzz-devel.i586 replaces harfbuzz-devel. This makes it impossible to compile both 32-bit and 64-bit applications using harfbuzz. Note that this is needed when compiling the MojoSetup installer for instance since it includes both 32-bit and 64-bit GTK backends into a single 'package'. This is why packages provide a -devel-32bit package in addition to the x86_64 and i586 -devel ones. See for instance glib2-devel-32bit, pango-devel-32bit or in different domains, libSDL-devel-32bit, libXcursor-devel-32bit, alsa-devel-32bit, etc. So the previous resolution saying to install harfbuzz-devel-0.9.40-4.2.i586.rpm is incorrect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.