[Bug 1111657] New: python-cffi build fail with glibc maintenance update
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657 Bug ID: 1111657 Summary: python-cffi build fail with glibc maintenance update Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: mlin@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- With glibc maintenance update https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/639803 , python-cffi build failed due to it can not pass unittest[1]. Both package are from SLE. [1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Leap:15.1:Staging... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c1
Max Lin
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c8
Richard Biener
gcc t.c -lffi -lm -m32 -O2 ./a.out expected = 0.334238 ffiresult = 0.334238
this means this is either a cffi issue or a glibc one. From the build log it appears that the ffi call results in NaN instead of the expected number. Andreas - can you check the ffi test program with the updated glibc on i586? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c9
Andreas Schwab
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c12
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c13
Richard Biener
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c14
Andreas Schwab
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c16
--- Comment #16 from Andreas Schwab
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
Max Lin
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c21
Andreas Schwab
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c23
--- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c24
Andreas Schwab
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c25
Ludwig Nussel
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c27
--- Comment #27 from Andreas Schwab
The correct fix is to fix the testsuite of python-cffi like upstream did.
So why is he wasting everyones time? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
Andreas Schwab
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c29
--- Comment #29 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c31
--- Comment #31 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c32
--- Comment #32 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c35
--- Comment #35 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c36
--- Comment #36 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c37
Matej Cepl
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c39
--- Comment #39 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c50
--- Comment #50 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c52
--- Comment #52 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c54
--- Comment #54 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c55
--- Comment #55 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c56
--- Comment #56 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c51
--- Comment #51 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c53
--- Comment #53 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111657#c63
--- Comment #63 from Swamp Workflow Management
participants (2)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com
-
bugzilla_noreply@suse.com