Comment # 15 on bug 1089349 from Fabian Vogt

(In reply to David Disseldorp from comment #14)
> It looks as though this has been addressed in mainline via
> c61ca5572508516b41039aecb23d936466076950 (v5.7+), which additionally adds a
> XATTR_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS/XATTR_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT/XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX check
> before ignoring vfs_setxattr -EOPNOTSUPP errors.
> 
> @Fabian: can this now be closed?

Great, that's essentially what my patch does, so I assume it works as well.

What about Goldwyn's concerns with this approach?