Comment # 38 on bug 1188949 from Vladislav Milenin

(In reply to Jonathan Kang from comment #37)
> (In reply to Vladislav Milenin from comment #36)
> > (In reply to Reinhard Max from comment #35)
> > > It contains no ACK packets either, so there is nothing new to learn from it.
> > 
> > It turns out that as a solution to the problem it is worth using the dhcp =
> > internal parameter from comment#7, since it was not possible to establish
> > the reason for the incorrect operation of the dhcp = dhclient parameter?
> 
> Yes, you can use "dhcp=internal" as a solution/workaround.

What then to do with an open bug?  I think it shouldn't be closed if new
details or ideas appear in the future.