libcap 2.30 is currenlty staged and tested for beingn upgraded to version 2.30

drpm fails to pass the test suite - and reports:

[   85s] ==1655== Memcheck, a memory error detector
[   85s] ==1655== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et
al.
[   85s] ==1655== Using Valgrind-3.15.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright
info
[   85s] ==1655== Command: ./drpm_api_tests
[   85s] ==1655== 
[   85s] ==1655== Syscall param prctl(arg4) contains uninitialised byte(s)
[   85s] ==1655==    at 0x4949167: syscall (in /lib/libc-2.30.so)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x50B0703: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x50B0E22: cap_get_bound (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x50B0384: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x401032B: call_init.part.0 (in /lib/ld-2.30.so)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x4010431: _dl_init (in /lib/ld-2.30.so)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x40010F9: ??? (in /lib/ld-2.30.so)
[   85s] ==1655==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
[   85s] ==1655==    at 0x50B06EC: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30)
[   85s] ==1655== 
[   85s] ==1655== Syscall param prctl(arg5) contains uninitialised byte(s)
[   85s] ==1655==    at 0x4949167: syscall (in /lib/libc-2.30.so)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x50B0703: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x50B0E22: cap_get_bound (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x50B0384: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x401032B: call_init.part.0 (in /lib/ld-2.30.so)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x4010431: _dl_init (in /lib/ld-2.30.so)
[   85s] ==1655==    by 0x40010F9: ??? (in /lib/ld-2.30.so)
[   85s] ==1655==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
[   85s] ==1655==    at 0x50B06EC: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30)


Looking at that, I rather assign it to the libcap maintainer