Bug ID | 1162015 |
---|---|
Summary | [staging] libcap 2.30 - drpm fails to pass test suite |
Classification | openSUSE |
Product | openSUSE Tumbleweed |
Version | Current |
Hardware | Other |
OS | Other |
Status | NEW |
Severity | Normal |
Priority | P5 - None |
Component | Basesystem |
Assignee | bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com |
Reporter | dimstar@opensuse.org |
QA Contact | qa-bugs@suse.de |
Found By | --- |
Blocker | --- |
libcap 2.30 is currenlty staged and tested for beingn upgraded to version 2.30 drpm fails to pass the test suite - and reports: [ 85s] ==1655== Memcheck, a memory error detector [ 85s] ==1655== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. [ 85s] ==1655== Using Valgrind-3.15.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info [ 85s] ==1655== Command: ./drpm_api_tests [ 85s] ==1655== [ 85s] ==1655== Syscall param prctl(arg4) contains uninitialised byte(s) [ 85s] ==1655== at 0x4949167: syscall (in /lib/libc-2.30.so) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x50B0703: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x50B0E22: cap_get_bound (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x50B0384: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x401032B: call_init.part.0 (in /lib/ld-2.30.so) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x4010431: _dl_init (in /lib/ld-2.30.so) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x40010F9: ??? (in /lib/ld-2.30.so) [ 85s] ==1655== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation [ 85s] ==1655== at 0x50B06EC: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30) [ 85s] ==1655== [ 85s] ==1655== Syscall param prctl(arg5) contains uninitialised byte(s) [ 85s] ==1655== at 0x4949167: syscall (in /lib/libc-2.30.so) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x50B0703: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x50B0E22: cap_get_bound (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x50B0384: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x401032B: call_init.part.0 (in /lib/ld-2.30.so) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x4010431: _dl_init (in /lib/ld-2.30.so) [ 85s] ==1655== by 0x40010F9: ??? (in /lib/ld-2.30.so) [ 85s] ==1655== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation [ 85s] ==1655== at 0x50B06EC: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcap.so.2.30) Looking at that, I rather assign it to the libcap maintainer