Comment # 42 on bug 1084943 from Frank Kruger

(In reply to Jonathan Kang from comment #41)
> (In reply to Frank Kruger from comment #38)
> > Isn't disabling wps by default brute force? What about those people using
> > it? Since the issue seems to be due to a race between NM (asking for
> > secrets) and sddm (not finished yet), as you wrote, I doubt that wps is the
> > main culprit.
> 
> Emm, you're right. Simply disabling that is not correct. The difference
> between
> KDE + sddm and GNOME + gdm(no issue) is that in GNOME, the first activation
> of
> wireless connection fails(same as KDE) but autoconnect of that connection get
> blocked due to no secret until network agent registers.
> 
> But in the logs provided in previous comments, there is no sign indicating
> the autoconnect is blocked and a agent registers. This should be the reason
> why
> it fails. I need spent a bit more time on it.

If you need additional logs, please let me know. Thanks for your efforts!