What | Removed | Added |
---|---|---|
Status | NEW | RESOLVED |
CC | bphilips@novell.com, mszeredi@novell.com | |
Resolution | --- | NORESPONSE |
Summary | VUL-1: acl: possible memory leak | acl: possible memory leak |
Marcus (Brenden, Miklos) sent to upstream ML just now. Closing. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: memory leak - __acl_init_obj, __new_var_obj_p Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:45:56 +0200 From: Andreas Stieger <astieger@suse.com> Organization: SUSE Linux GmbH To: acl-devel@nongnu.org Hello, > [ 124s] ================================================================= != ~ > [ 124s] ==7762==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks != ~ > [ 124s] != ~ > [ 124s] Indirect leak of 216 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: != ~ > [ 124s] #0 0x7f94b5001c4a in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.2+0x96c4a) != ~ > [ 124s] #1 0x7f94b4d610bc in __acl_init_obj (/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/acl-2.2.52/libacl/.libs/libacl.so.1+0x70bc) != ~ > [ 124s] != ~ > [ 124s] Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: != ~ > [ 124s] #0 0x7f94b5001c4a in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.2+0x96c4a) != ~ > [ 124s] #1 0x7f94b4d6423a in __new_var_obj_p (/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/acl-2.2.52/libacl/.libs/libacl.so.1+0xa23a) != ~ > [ 124s] != ~ > [ 124s] SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 272 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). != ~ This is probably a minor concern, but maybe the above makes sense to fix? Our bug: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929108