(In reply to Dominique Leuenberger from comment #16) > (In reply to Mikhail Kasimov from comment #15) > > (In reply to Dominique Leuenberger from comment #14) > > > (In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #13) > > > > hand over to Dominique for TW > > > > > > Updated TW also to: > > > > > > ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" > > > ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" > > > > > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/openSUSE:Factory/ > > > 000product?linkrev=base&rev=122 > > > > > > for kubic I wonder if ID_LIKE should remain > > > ID_LIKE="suse opensuse" (as-is) > > > or change to > > > ID_LIKE="suse opensuse opensuse-tumbleweed" (feels somewhat more correct) > > > > In case of ID_LIKE="suse opensuse opensuse-tumbleweed", for Leap should be > > ID_LIKE="suse opensuse opensuse-leap", I suppose to be in single > > naming-scheme? > > Leap has (so far) no sub-projects, but yes, I'd argue that those will have > to set ID_LIKE="suse opensuse opensuse-leap" Today -- yes, no sub-projects for Leap. But who knows what can be tomorrow/in a year/etc.../ ? Yes, it's better to be ready now, instead of urgently fixing something in future. :) > > What about: ID_LIKE="suse-opensuse" or, even, ID_LIKE="suse-opensuse-leap" | > > "suse-opensuse-tumbleweed" ? > > erm.. no. ID_LIKE is a LIST of OS-identifiers the OS is derived from.. so > suse/opensuse/opensuse-tumbleweed in case of TW Kubic. Space in there is > absolutely wanted. OK. ID_LIKE="suse opensuse opensuse-leap" and ID_LIKE="suse opensuse opensuse-tumbleweed".