(In reply to Michal Hocko from comment #3) > > Why is keeping the udev rule in udev/systemd a problem in the first place. Because the policy doesn't belong to udev either. And the udev rule looks like a workaround as it's described in the commit message I pointed out in comment #0. > This is where we keep other udev rules. That doesn't mean necessarily that *all* kind of rules must be hosted by udev.