|Comment #7 is private||1|
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #10) > IMO kernel-default-base should be the same as kernel-default but just exclude > support for physical hardware. Anything else is just asking for trouble. > I can definitely see use-cases for 9pfs in production. Sounds like you are still assuming kernel-*-base subpackage was designed for use in general purpose VMs. AFAIK this is not true, even package description says something very different. What you want is rather closer to -ec2 flavor we have had earlier or kvmsmall config recently introduced in newer branches (it is meant for developer use but it's probably closer to your idea what -base subpackage should be than actual -base). Therefore my suggestions from comment 7.