Comment # 4 on bug 1215837 from Varun Kumar Ojha

You are absolutely correct, and I apologize for the confusion. The issue indeed
appears to be related to NetworkManager, and there is no direct connection to
KVM or virtualization. 

I kept KVM because it is seen twice on KVM.

The use of "KVM" in the component field seems to be a misclassification. It
should be corrected to accurately reflect that the problem is with
NetworkManager and not KVM or virtualization.

Thank you for pointing out this discrepancy, and I appreciate your attention to
detail.