Comment # 19 on bug 992519 from Felix Miata

(In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #18)
> AFAICT there are no font requirements of release-notes-openSUSE in TW or
> Leap so I think this bug can be closed. Felix, could you please confirm? 

Senior bug 926792 dup'd to this was exactly about that:

# grep RETT /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Leap 42.3"
# zypper in release-notes-openSUSE
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...
Resolving package dependencies...

Problem: release-notes-openSUSE-42.3.20170911-6.1.noarch requires
google-opensans-fonts, but this requirement cannot be provided
  uninstallable providers: google-opensans-fonts-1.0-14.3.noarch[OSS]
 Solution 1: remove lock to allow installation of
google-opensans-fonts-1.0-14.3.noarch[OSS]
 Solution 2: do not install release-notes-openSUSE-42.3.20170911-6.1.noarch
 Solution 3: break release-notes-openSUSE-42.3.20170911-6.1.noarch by ignoring
some of its dependencies

Choose from above solutions by number or cancel [1/2/3/c] (c): c 

> Also please feel free to file tickets for the mentioned online services.

Tickets for what for the online services, that they don't all use the same
stylesheets? That they don't declare the same base-level (html,body) fonts? If
yes to the latter, which fonts are they supposed to be declaring as first
choice? Lucida Grande and Helvetica Neue are Mac fonts. Source Sans Pro and
DejaVu Sans AFAIK are the only two declared that may be part of a minimal X
openSUSE installation, and Open Sans is only installed because of the
release-notes-openSUSE require. Who's responsible to determine what "look and
feel" desires?