(In reply to Franck Bui from comment #2) > (In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #0) > > systemd-boot calls itself "Linux Boot Manager". Maybe it should brand itself > > according to /etc/os-release. Upstream issue: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/17044 > > This seems to have been addressed by the introduction of the new option > "--efi-boot-option-description=", which should be available when v252 will > be released (hopefully soon). That helps if you call it manually maybe. I assume the distro will call bootctl install unattended somehow. Eg after package installation to update the bootloader. So it somehow has to remember what to pass. Therefore either a config file is needed or a different value has to be built in. > Note that according to the man page, there is usually no need to change the > description "Linux Boot Manager" though. Well, upstream thinks there's only one instance of sd-boot. In practice it's installed by a specific distribution so in the end different distros will again compete about that entry. So IMO we should still label that with openSUSE. > Ludwig are you OK to close this report ? I'd like to keep this open to track the missing feature.