(In reply to Mikhail Kasimov from comment #15) > (In reply to Dominique Leuenberger from comment #14) > > (In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #13) > > > hand over to Dominique for TW > > > > Updated TW also to: > > > > ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" > > ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" > > > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/openSUSE:Factory/ > > 000product?linkrev=base&rev=122 > > > > for kubic I wonder if ID_LIKE should remain > > ID_LIKE="suse opensuse" (as-is) > > or change to > > ID_LIKE="suse opensuse opensuse-tumbleweed" (feels somewhat more correct) > > In case of ID_LIKE="suse opensuse opensuse-tumbleweed", for Leap should be > ID_LIKE="suse opensuse opensuse-leap", I suppose to be in single > naming-scheme? Leap has (so far) no sub-projects, but yes, I'd argue that those will have to set ID_LIKE="suse opensuse opensuse-leap" > What about: ID_LIKE="suse-opensuse" or, even, ID_LIKE="suse-opensuse-leap" | > "suse-opensuse-tumbleweed" ? erm.. no. ID_LIKE is a LIST of OS-identifiers the OS is derived from.. so suse/opensuse/opensuse-tumbleweed in case of TW Kubic. Space in there is absolutely wanted.