Comment # 36 on bug 938659 from Markus Elfring

(In reply to Markus Elfring from comment #30)
> I would prefer an other approach to drill down into involved details.

Are any consequences from the file "/usr/lib/udev/rules.d/51-android.rules"
interesting for further detail checks?

Example:

���
# Kyocera
SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="0482", MODE="0660", GROUP="users"
���


Does a varying execution order of background processes matter here for the
involved activation of desired settings?

Is only the assignment specification 'key:="value"' safe then in this use case?