Comment # 14 on bug 1226217 from David Anes
(In reply to Dirk Stoecker from comment #12)
> If it would strip the content-length in the transfer encoding coming from
> the script case because of the information in the link you provided I can
> live with this. I don't think that combination is used anywhere that we have
> a receiver relying on the content length and using transfer encoding. Also
> doesn't make much sense anyway: If I know the length of the transfer at the
> beginning chunked transfer is wasted bandwidth.

I fully agree. Let me investigate now the problem has been narrowed down to a
very simple case.


You are receiving this mail because: