Comment # 22 on bug 1125841 from Martin Kalivoda

(In reply to Christian Boltz from comment #21)
This has nothing to do with apparmor itself and I see no reason to expect
denials in audit log. As described in #18: This bug is caused by wrong
expectations from libvirt - it expects /usr/sbin/libvirtd in profile lists but
profile list only contains "libvirtd" because profile was changed to named
profile with name "libvirtd" by commit linked in #17. Code linked in #18 then
thinks that libvirtd is not confined and thinks that apparmor is not activated
which then results in error from original post.