Comment # 7 on bug 1177017 from
(In reply to Jan Engelhardt from comment #6)
> No. Now that you mention it, this bugzilla entry only shows comments 3, 4
> and 5 to me, which means anything prior was either deleted or somehow marked
> hidden/private, though I have only ever seen the private flag being set on a
> ticket as a whole, not for individual comments (that would be very
> confusing, as there is no error message like there is for a private ticket).

That's very odd.  FWIW, I only see my first comment when I'm logged in. 
However, even then I don't see comments 2 and 3, but I didn't get any emails
about them either.  Could changes to the bug (e.g., reassignments) cause
comment # bumps?

Anyway, just so you can see it, here's what's in my first comment:

(In reply to Marc Joliet from comment #0)
> iwd fails to start starting with openSUSE-release 20200923.  My systemd
> journal consistantly says:
> 
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin iwd[8359]: RC4 support not found
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin iwd[8359]: The following options are missing in the
> kernel:
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin iwd[8359]:         CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_SKCIPHER
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin iwd[8359]:         CONFIG_CRYPTO_ECB
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin iwd[8359]:         CONFIG_CRYPTO_ARC4
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin systemd[1]: iwd.service: Main process exited,
> code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin systemd[1]: iwd.service: Failed with result
> 'exit-code'.
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin systemd[1]: Failed to start Wireless service.
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin systemd[1]: iwd.service: Scheduled restart job,
> restart counter is at 5.
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin systemd[1]: Stopped Wireless service.
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin systemd[1]: iwd.service: Start request repeated too
> quickly.
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin systemd[1]: iwd.service: Failed with result
> 'exit-code'.
> Sep 27 13:37:02 urchin systemd[1]: Failed to start Wireless service.
> 
> Perhaps iwd needs to be rebuilt without support for the ciphers not
> available in the kernel.


You are receiving this mail because: