Comment # 5 on bug 908738 from Michal Srb

(In reply to Petr Gajdos from comment #4)
> In my opinion, they should have to be pushed upstream on the first place,
> not downstream. Are there some bugs opened against fltk? I think you should
> ask 'people from tigervnc' if they notified fltk upstream and what was the
> result.
> 
> Sorry, I have no time to maintain a big patch set.

Ok, understandable. I searched if they ever tried to upstream these patches and
why they weren't accepted and instead I found that they got accepted quite
recently and are in current release 1.3.3. We currently have 1.3.2 in current
openSUSE and SLES12.

So follow up question: Would it be possible to upgrade fltk to 1.3.3, or should
I backport the upstream patches into 1.3.2? In the second case, it would
probably be svn revisions 9974, 10196 and 10260. Maybe some more, I would have
to test it first to be sure. All those just add new features (custom cursors
and accessing clipboard), they don't modify existing functionality.