Comment # 5 on bug 1133254 from Aaron Puchert

(In reply to Martin Li��ka from comment #4)
> That's not true, LTO creates a faster binaries with LTO.
Of course it does, I'm just suspecting it won't be much faster. I'm not
doubting the merits of LTO, although I personally prefer Clang's ThinLTO
because of the smaller resource usage, and I hope that GCC will offer something
similar sometime in the future.

> > In addition, LLVM builds already take very long, and even just ThinLTO is
> > going to make that worse.
> 
> For now, I would not make the build even longer.

I'm not sure if the "lamb" machines all have the same hardware, but the current
build in devel:tools:compiler takes ~10000s, while with ThinLTO it takes
~15000s. I should compare the build times on the same machine though to be
sure.