Comment # 12 on bug 1036463 from Lee Duncan

(In reply to Michal Marek from comment #11)
> Re comment 7, comment 8:
> Sure, the patch does not introduce any dependency between sg and the
> different scsi device drivers. But that's the same with the current
> approach, there is no guarantee that the modules will finish initializing in
> a given order. And I actually do not see any udev rules working with
> sd/sr/st devices and sg devices at the same time, so where is the issue?

I suspect an issue may come up if a customer scripts a sequence where they
install there device, rescan the SCSI bus, and then expect sg access to the
device, particularly in a busy system. But that is speculation.