Comment # 4 on bug 1000732 from Steffen Winterfeldt

Yes, we've put us into a pretty mess here ourselves.

13.2:       enp0s9
leap 42.1:  eth0
leap 42.2:  eth0
tumbleweed: enp0s9

13.2 & TW go for 'predictable' names, leap for kernel names. Can't the
community make up their mind?

The mac address is not stored, so you can't relate interface names based on
that.

One way I see would be to re-do what 80-net-setup-link.rules does in yast to
see which names the interfaces would have had.

FWIW, I'd add net.ifnames=0/1 to my boot options and be done either way.

Ludwig, was it a deliberate decision to go for classical interface names in
Leap or did it just happen? Do we have a plan to consolidate either way?