[Bug 1029190] pcre2: support for package variants according to the evaluation of bigger regular expressions

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029190 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029190#c2 Markus Elfring changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(Markus.Elfring@we | |b.de) | --- Comment #2 from Markus Elfring --- (In reply to Andreas Stieger from comment #1)

So it is a performance trade-off.

Yes. - I am looking for another configuration variant because of this detail when I am building this software from the source files not only for myself.

Which application needs patterns in excess of 64k please?

A bit of background can be also found in my bug report “Advanced data processing for an alternation with a lot of key words”. https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1916

What prevents you from linking against the 32 bit library in the first place?

Nothing directly. - But there are further constraints to consider for modules in other programming languages if you would like to follow a change request like “Support for PCRE2”. https://github.com/mmottl/pcre-ocaml/issues/10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.