Comment # 4 on bug 1026975 from Jan Matejek

(In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #3)
> I wouldn't want to replace the default python3 as it comes from SLE.
> Parallel installable versions would be ok. I'm not sure if that's
> technically feasible though :)

Not really for what we want, I suspect. All modules would still be built for
3.4; i could hack 3.6 to see them, but it would not load binary modules, it
wouldn't get pyc files ( = worse startup times, plus mystery untracked files if
you ever run anything in 3.6 as root), also, as noted before, no guarantees
that packages for 3.4 would actually work with 3.6

Also I'm happy to submit a "python3" package for 3.6 that doesn't conflict with
"python3" from SLES and you get two packages of the same name, but I'm not
going to prepare a renamed "python36" package for this .... i mean, there have
been some vague plans for doing exactly this and supporting parallel
installations natively, but i'm not going there on such short notice.