Comment # 4 on bug 931429 from
(In reply to Petr Cerny from comment #3)
> As for the tcpwrappers - I don't feel very comfortable with adding it back.
> While I'm fine with adding the patch as such, I don't see a good reason to
> build it by default, especially when building own packages in BS is really
> easy.

Or we could make it a configurable run-time option, that would be off by
default. That might make more sense...


You are receiving this mail because: