Comment # 5 on bug 1006221 from Petr Cerny

(In reply to Adam Spiers from comment #4)
> (In reply to Petr Cerny from comment #3)
> > It is, but producing a message depending on whether the port is standard 22
> > or something else will just inflate it.
> 
> It will inflate what?  It would hardly be a huge inflation to the source
> code.

I was afraid it would inflate the patch by adding reverse logic to ssh-keygen
argument parsing. Fortunately it didn't turn out to be the case, so it will be
fixed in the next MU.

> > Mentioning the ssh-keygen(1) man page should be enough, imho.
> 
> Surely that's not as helpful as providing a command they can use directly
> via cut and paste?

Yes, yet it also makes one more thing to think of when ssh-keygen behaviour
changes, thus making it prone to rotting.