Comment # 6 on bug 1006221 from Adam Spiers

(In reply to Petr Cerny from comment #5)
> (In reply to Adam Spiers from comment #4)
> > It will inflate what?  It would hardly be a huge inflation to the source
> > code.
> 
> I was afraid it would inflate the patch by adding reverse logic to
> ssh-keygen argument parsing.

Ah, OK.

> Fortunately it didn't turn out to be the case,
> so it will be fixed in the next MU.

Great, thanks!

> > > Mentioning the ssh-keygen(1) man page should be enough, imho.
> > 
> > Surely that's not as helpful as providing a command they can use directly
> > via cut and paste?
> 
> Yes, yet it also makes one more thing to think of when ssh-keygen behaviour
> changes, thus making it prone to rotting.

Yeah, that's true.  Hopefully low risk though :)