Comment # 9 on bug 1094575 from Hanns-Joachim Uhl

(In reply to Johannes Thumshirn from comment #8)
> (In reply to Michal Kube��ek from comment #7)
> > My biggest concern is that with the backports in SLE15 and SLE15-UPDATE, it's
> > likely that first SLE15 maintenance update is going to use different address
> > than GMC kernel. And if that may result in "not authorized" error and broken
> > networking, we may want to avoid such inconsistency.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> IBM I'd like to drop the affected patches from the SLE15-UPDATE branch until
> this issue is resolved. Would this be OK
.
Hello SUSE / Johannes,
just for clarification ...
... you are thinking to revert these two patches 
from the SLES 15-Update kernel for now:
1.
"
* Fri May 18 2018 tbogendoerfer@suse.de
...
- s390/qeth: use Read device to query hypervisor for MAC
  (bsc#1061024 FATE#323301).
- commit 22f22c5
"
2.
"
* Tue May 15 2018 jthumshirn@suse.de
...
- s390/qeth: fix MAC address update sequence (bnc#1093148,
  LTC#167307).
...
- commit a741d19
"
... correct ...? 
Please confirm or advise ...
Thanks for your support.