Comment # 8 on bug 1202027 from Richard Biener

(In reply to Martin Li������ka from comment #7)
> Ok, I've just made 2 builds with profiledbootstrap and
> --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto on a machine where ASLR is disabled but
> still we face so arc counter differences in hash table related functions
> like htab_find_slot_with_hash, htab_mod, ...
> Well, very many hash tables are pointer-based on based on the address hash
> is different and so table collisions are not stable. I think it's an
> unrealistic assumption that the memory layout of 2 running compiler
> invocations will be always the same, right?!

The gcc package also disables ASLR.  But yes, I think that with ASLR disabled
pointer hash table behavior should reproduce exactly.  At least I can't find
a good reason why it should not?

Btw, I wanted to check whether the issue reproduces also without LTO ...