Comment # 15 on bug 1141105 from J��rg Schiling

(In reply to Martin Li��ka from comment #13)
> (In reply to J��rg Schiling from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Martin Li��ka from comment #9)
> > 
> > > That is still under investigation and since we don't have a reasonable
> > > test-case, we can't prove that.
> > 
> > Well you have a test case. mkisofs can be used as a test case, but I guess
> > that any three liner that calls error() is sufficient. You already have a
> > 100% prove for my statements in the two bug reports with the same signature
> > of problems.
> > 
> > BTW: I do not have access to your environment that causes the problem.

> If you mean official parameter list from glibc, then the source code is wrong
> because the signature in glibc is (man error):

I do not care about the parameter list from glibc since I am using the official
parameter list of the error() function as defined in 1982.

Glibc implements a parameter list that is in conflict with the official
parameter list and glibc did this more than 30 years after error() has been
introduced. So glibc does not seem to care about existing interfaces.