Comment # 14 on bug 1207989 from Richard Biener

(In reply to Stefan Br���ns from comment #13)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> > I wonder why the lapacke reference is mangled to LAPACK_cggsvp ...
> > 
> > OK, I think that LAPACKE/include/lapack.h simply misses declarations of the
> > deprecated functions and the call in LAPACKE/src/lapacke_cggsvp_work.c
> > is likely not prototyped:
> > [...] 
> > I wonder how other distros resolved the API deprecation, like whether they
> > bumped the SONAME and removed the interfaces.
> 
> The cherry-picked commit which readded the declarations is part of LAPACK
> 3.9.1, and current is 3.11.0.
> 
> I think we should upgrade to at least 3.9.1 for SLE/Leap, and 3.11.0 for TW.

IMHO there's no need to deviate and a version upgrade for SLE/Leap 15 needs
justification anyway (and the maintainance bots will complain about the
missing symbols we've added for the original issue, but it might be possible
to get a waiver for them).