(In reply to Andreas Stieger from comment #5) > What the user wants is a zero-setup, distributed cache on a shared writable > path, invalidation without central instance or consensus, but with > resilience against hosts that are configured what he calls "anti-social" - > DWIM. I don't need invalidation, everything in the cache has been installed on at least one host. I don't expect to have to deal with malicious hosts. What I called anti-social is zypper deleting complete repos which on that particular host are irrelevant to start with. zypper could just keep its fingers off areas it is not involved in. I understand RMT to be creating complete mirrors of repos, I don't need all those GBytes. > You could build something opportunistic with rsync. Done, that's how I noticed stuff disappearing.