Comment # 11 on bug 1189003 from Ulrich Windl

(In reply to Arvin Schnell from comment #10)
> Sorry, I do not understand what you are trying to tell me. I value it
> as NORESPONSE.

Well, you could have been more explicit: So it seems I forgot to leave out the
disk names? I thought (as the other (two) disks are not involved (they are not
encrypted)) they would play no role.
Do you want to see the IDs of partitions, LVs, etc.? Or do you want to see the
other two disks?
Of course the decrypted disks in the running system are not named like
/dev/mapper/cr-auto-1.
If you'd share your thought a bit more verbosely, it would be easier for me to
provide the information you need.