Comment # 3 on bug 907966 from
We designed it that way:

$ ls -l en/*.dic | grep -v 'hyph_'
-rw-r--r-- 1 pgajdos users 563066 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_AU.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_BS.dic -> en_GB.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_BZ.dic -> en_GB.dic
-rw-r--r-- 1 pgajdos users 642481 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_CA.dic
-rw-r--r-- 1 pgajdos users 701655 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_GB.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_GH.dic -> en_GB.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_IE.dic -> en_GB.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_IN.dic -> en_GB.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_JM.dic -> en_GB.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_MW.dic -> en_ZA.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_NA.dic -> en_ZA.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_NZ.dic -> en_GB.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_PH.dic -> en_US.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_TT.dic -> en_GB.dic
-rw-r--r-- 1 pgajdos users 641025 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_US.dic
-rw-r--r-- 1 pgajdos users 595949 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_ZA.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users      9 Sep 11 14:06 en/en_ZW.dic -> en_ZA.dic

$ ls -l ar/*.dic | grep -v 'hyph_'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_AE.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_BH.dic -> ar.dic
-rw-r--r-- 1 pgajdos users 7079304 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_DZ.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_EG.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_IQ.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_JO.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_KW.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_LB.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_LY.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_MA.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_OM.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_QA.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_SA.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_SD.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_SY.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_TN.dic -> ar.dic
lrwxrwxrwx 1 pgajdos users       6 Sep 11 14:06 ar/ar_YE.dic -> ar.dic

(These symlinks are based on dictionaries.xcu meta data.) You see that this
will introduce dependencies between subpackages. E. g. ar_DZ will depend on ar
subpackage. Hmm.

I am also not sure how to work out obsoletes/provides e. g. for the former en
supackage. You see that, for ar package it is easy, myspell-ar will contain
ar.dic. For english, though, there is nothing like en.dic.


You are receiving this mail because: