Comment # 12 on bug 1179521 from Stefan Br���ns

(In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #7)
> Ok, let's consider this fixed. Thanks for reporting and checking!

Unfortunately, the added check is incorrect:

rpm -E 'requires_eq libhdf5' expands to "%nil". It has to include soversion,
i.e. libhdf5-103 (currently). Obviously, this does not scale ...

On the other hand, HDFGroup has adjusted their versioning policy and relaxed
the check:
https://github.com/HDFGroup/hdf5/pull/1494/files

I.e. we can now (hopefully) rely on the soversion, which should be bumped when
major/minor changes, but can be kept when only the release changes.