Comment # 29 on bug 947816 from
(In reply to Joey Lee from comment #28)
> (In reply to Joey Lee from comment #27)
> > (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #26)
> > > OK, thanks for confirmation.  Yes, it sucks, I fully agree.
> > > 
> > > The workaround shouldn't be too hard, but it seems that upstream didn't like
> > > the ideal to fall back.  Nevertheless, we may fix it inside kdump load.sh
> > > instead of kexec, too.
> > 
> > Yes, the kexec upstream doesn't not take my patch on boo#951144 to fallback
> > to old kexec system call. As you said, the kdump script needs to implement
> > the fallback.
> 
> I simply traced the kdump code, my plan is to add the logic to
> init/rc.kdump.functions.

hm... the kdump in openSUSE:Factory looks different with the kdump in
openSUSE:42.1/42.2.
As Taskshi mention, the init/load.sh should takes the logic to call kexec-file.


You are receiving this mail because: